Safety Assessment and Risk Estimation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Operating in National Airspace System

Abstract

This paper proposes an effective approach for modelling and assessing the risks associated with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) integrated into national airspace system (NAS). Two critical hazards with UAV operations are considered and analyzed, which are ground impacts and midair collisions. Threats to fatalities that result from the two hazards are the focus in the proposed method. In order to realize ground impact assessment, a multifactor risk model is designed by calculating system reliability required to meet a target level of safety for different UAV categories. Both fixed-wing and rotary-wing UAVs are taken into account under a real scenario that is further partitioned into different zones to make the evaluation more precise. Official territory and population data of the operation scenario are incorporated, as well as UAV self-properties. Casualty area of impacting debris can be obtained as well as the probability of fatal injuries on the ground. Sheltering factors are not neglected and defined as four types based on the real scenario. When midair collision fatality risk is estimated, a model of aircraft collisions based on the density of civil flight in different regions over Chinese airspace is proposed. In the model, a relative collision area and flying speed between UAVs and manned aircraft are constructed to calculate expected frequency of fatalities for each province correspondingly. Truthful data with different numbers of UAVs is incorporated in the model with the expected number of fatalities after a collision is included. Experimental simulations are made to evaluate the ground impacts and midair collisions when UAVs operate in the NAS.

Managing the drone revolution: A systematic literature review into the current use of airborne drones and future strategic directions for their effective control

“…A competing view is considering whether drones should be integrated into the overall air transport management system ( Zhang et al, 2018 ) and managed using many of the same tools and mechanisms deployed by regular aircraft such as identification and collision avoidance systems ( Lin, 2019 ). There is a view that far more oversight of the sector will be required to ensure that safety conditions can be met, and that airborne drones cannot operate separately to large aircraft with which drones will share airspace.…”

Model of Third-Party Risk Index for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Delivery in Urban Environment

“…For example, when 80% of the area in a grid was lakes and 20% of the area was exposed, the vegetation type of the grid was defined as lakes. Finally, we assigned barrier factors to each unit according to the allocation rules shown in Table 3 [32]. The results are shown in Figure 4.…”

ACAS installation on unmanned aerial vehicles: effectiveness and safety issues

“…It is intuitively clear that the solution lies in the application of different technologies, with the definition of new processes and procedures, but, most importantly, with the necessary analysis of the effectiveness of the adopted solution. Considering the fact that nowadays research papers regarding the UAV are mostly oriented on general safety purposes (Tomić et al , 2020; Zhang et al , 2018; Hak-Tae et al , 2013; Guglieri et al , 2014) with the aim of highlighting safety risks that emerge from the UAV operations, analyses of the effectiveness of new technical solutions are of great importance.…”