2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and usefulness of acetylcholine provocation test in patients with no culprit lesions on emergency coronary angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology guidelines also indicated that intracoronary provocative tests may be undertaken after ACS has become stable [83,84]. However, some recent reports showed that during emergent CAG, ACh-provocation test was safely performed in ACS patients with nonobstructive culprit lesions and was useful to diagnose coronary spasminduced ACS in those patients [6,7,85]. Nonetheless, the indication for the ACh-provocation test during emergent CAG in ACS patients remains controversial.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Coronary Spasm By the Ach-provocation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology guidelines also indicated that intracoronary provocative tests may be undertaken after ACS has become stable [83,84]. However, some recent reports showed that during emergent CAG, ACh-provocation test was safely performed in ACS patients with nonobstructive culprit lesions and was useful to diagnose coronary spasminduced ACS in those patients [6,7,85]. Nonetheless, the indication for the ACh-provocation test during emergent CAG in ACS patients remains controversial.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Coronary Spasm By the Ach-provocation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective rate of CCB in VA patients in Japan was 92.5% [16] which is similar to our stenting group (88%)and stent-free group(89%) Other literatures reported that aspirin, statins and ACEi could prevent spasm and improve the prognosis of patients [17][18][19] . In addition, we included VA patients,whose diagnostic criteria included resting angina and transient elevation of ST segment one ECG without spasm provocation test, but could be diagnosed as VA with high specificity [10,20,21] , it has been reported that provocation test is safe and effective for VA patients with no significant stenosis [22] ,but provocation test has more advantages than disadvantages for VA patients with severe stenosis [23] , We believe that provocation test may lead to unstable plaque shedding, which increases the incidence of MACE and affects the results of the trial. Most of the studies mentioned in this paper are diagnosed as VSA by provocation test, but ST-segment depression is more common than elevation during coronary spasm [24] , so we don't think the two situations should be studied together.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey from Japan revealed that up to 40% of patients with angina might have a component of VSA [ 6 ]; however, the exact prevalence is unknown. Although provocative testing during invasive coronary angiography has gained traction in recent years, it is still only performed at a few specialised centres.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%