Safety and security co-engineering for highly automated vehicles

Schwarzl, Christian; Marko, Nadja Christiane; Martin, Helmut; Jiménez, Víctor J. Expósito; Triginer, Joaquim Maria Castella; Winkler, Bernhard; Bramberger, Robert

doi:10.1007/s00502-021-00934-w

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the former can be assigned to the area of AI ethics (see Vakkuri et al, 2019 ; Kazim and Koshiyama, 2021 ), the latter is according to Carlini et al ( 2019 ) a security-relevant topic. The importance of security in state-of-the-art vehicle development is discussed, for example, in Schwarzl et al ( 2021 ). The authors discuss the impact of security risks on safety and outline safety and security co-analysis and co-design methods in autonomous driving.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A review on AI Safety in highly automated driving

Waschle¹,

Thaler²,

Berres³

et al. 2022

Front. Artif. Intell.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Remarkable progress in the fields of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) has led to an increased number of applications of (data-driven) AI systems for the partial or complete control of safety-critical systems. Recently, ML solutions have been particularly popular. Such approaches are often met with concerns regarding their correct and safe execution, which is often caused by missing knowledge or intransparency of their exact functionality. The investigation and derivation of methods for the safety assessment of AI systems are thus of great importance. Among others, these issues are addressed in the field of AI Safety. The aim of this work is to provide an overview of this field by means of a systematic literature review with special focus on the area of highly automated driving, as well as to present a selection of approaches and methods for the safety assessment of AI systems. Particularly, validation, verification, and testing are considered in light of this context. In the review process, two distinguished classes of approaches have been identified: On the one hand established methods, either referring to already published standards or well-established concepts from multiple research areas outside ML and AI. On the other hand newly developed approaches, including methods tailored to the scope of ML and AI which gained importance only in recent years.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We explicitly excluded the topic of security from the literature research process. As indicated in Schwarzl et al ( 2021 ), a security analysis is indispensable for a comprehensive safety analysis. Thus, an enhancement of the search criteria in direction of security may complete the picture.…”

Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%