Abstract:Background:
Glycemic control is particularly challenging for toddlers and preschoolers with type 1 diabetes (T1D), and data on the use of closed-loop systems in this age range are limited.
Materials and Methods:
We studied use of a modified investigational version of the Tandem t:slim X2 Control-IQ system in children aged 2 to 5 years during 48 h in an outpatient supervised hotel (SH) setting followed by 3 days of home use to examine the safety of this system in young c… Show more
“…Pilot safety and effectiveness studies in young children have been performed on the t:slim X2™ with Control-IQ (Tandem, Diabetes Care, San Diego, CA) 17 and Omnipod™ Horizon (Insulet Corporation, Acton, MA) systems. 22 The former studied 12 children (4.7 Cordero, PhD).…”
Section: Mode Use Improved Glycemia When Compared To Run-in Manualmentioning
Background
Highly variable insulin sensitivity, susceptibility to hypoglycemia and inability to effectively communicate hypoglycemic symptoms pose significant challenges for young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Herein, outcomes during clinical MiniMed™ 670G system use were evaluated in children aged 2–6 years with T1D.
Methods
Participants (N = 46, aged 4.6 ± 1.4 years) at seven investigational centers used the MiniMed™ 670G system in Manual Mode during a two‐week run‐in period followed by Auto Mode during a three‐month study phase. Safety events, mean A1C, sensor glucose (SG), and percentage of time spent in (TIR, 70–180 mg/dl), below (TBR, <70 mg/dl) and above (TAR, >180 mg/dl) range were assessed for the run‐in and study phase and compared using a paired t‐test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
Results
From run‐in to end of study (median 87.1% time in auto mode), mean A1C and SG changed from 8.0 ± 0.9% to 7.5 ± 0.6% (p < 0.001) and from 173 ± 24 to 161 ± 16 mg/dl (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall TIR increased from 55.7 ± 13.4% to 63.8 ± 9.4% (p < 0.001), while TBR and TAR decreased from 3.3 ± 2.5% to 3.2 ± 1.6% (p = 0.996) and 41.0 ± 14.7% to 33.0 ± 9.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Overnight TBR remained unchanged and TAR was further improved 12:00 am–6:00 am. Throughout the study phase, there were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and no serious adverse device‐related events.
Conclusions
At‐home MiniMed™ 670G Auto Mode use by young children safely improved glycemic outcomes compared to two‐week open‐loop Manual Mode use. The improvements are similar to those observed in older children, adolescents and adults with T1D using the same system for the same duration of time.
“…Pilot safety and effectiveness studies in young children have been performed on the t:slim X2™ with Control-IQ (Tandem, Diabetes Care, San Diego, CA) 17 and Omnipod™ Horizon (Insulet Corporation, Acton, MA) systems. 22 The former studied 12 children (4.7 Cordero, PhD).…”
Section: Mode Use Improved Glycemia When Compared To Run-in Manualmentioning
Background
Highly variable insulin sensitivity, susceptibility to hypoglycemia and inability to effectively communicate hypoglycemic symptoms pose significant challenges for young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Herein, outcomes during clinical MiniMed™ 670G system use were evaluated in children aged 2–6 years with T1D.
Methods
Participants (N = 46, aged 4.6 ± 1.4 years) at seven investigational centers used the MiniMed™ 670G system in Manual Mode during a two‐week run‐in period followed by Auto Mode during a three‐month study phase. Safety events, mean A1C, sensor glucose (SG), and percentage of time spent in (TIR, 70–180 mg/dl), below (TBR, <70 mg/dl) and above (TAR, >180 mg/dl) range were assessed for the run‐in and study phase and compared using a paired t‐test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test.
Results
From run‐in to end of study (median 87.1% time in auto mode), mean A1C and SG changed from 8.0 ± 0.9% to 7.5 ± 0.6% (p < 0.001) and from 173 ± 24 to 161 ± 16 mg/dl (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall TIR increased from 55.7 ± 13.4% to 63.8 ± 9.4% (p < 0.001), while TBR and TAR decreased from 3.3 ± 2.5% to 3.2 ± 1.6% (p = 0.996) and 41.0 ± 14.7% to 33.0 ± 9.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Overnight TBR remained unchanged and TAR was further improved 12:00 am–6:00 am. Throughout the study phase, there were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and no serious adverse device‐related events.
Conclusions
At‐home MiniMed™ 670G Auto Mode use by young children safely improved glycemic outcomes compared to two‐week open‐loop Manual Mode use. The improvements are similar to those observed in older children, adolescents and adults with T1D using the same system for the same duration of time.
“…A recent short pilot study evaluated a modified investigational version of the Tandem t:slim X 2 Control-IQ system in very young children (2–5 years old) in both a supervised and home setting with unrestricted meals and snacks. The system significantly improved TIR compared to baseline, with <6% hypoglycemia and <40% hyperglycemia in 83% of participants compared to 33% prior to system use [63].…”
Section: The Implementation Of New Diabetes Technologies To Reduce Hypo- and Hyperglycemia And Their Impact On Cognition And Brain Develomentioning
Human and experimental animal data suggest both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia can lead to altered brain structure and neurocognitive function in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Young children with T1D are prone to extreme fluctuations in glucose levels. The overlap of these potential dysglycemic insults to the brain during the time of most active brain and cognitive development may cause cellular and structural injuries that appear to persist into adult life. Brain structure and cognition in persons with T1D are influenced by age of onset, exposure to glycemic extremes such as severe hypoglycemic episodes, history of diabetic ketoacidosis, persistent hyperglycemia, and glucose variability. Studies using brain imaging techniques have shown brain changes that appear to be influenced by metabolic abnormalities characteristic of diabetes, changes apparent at diagnosis and persistent throughout adulthood. Some evidence suggests that brain injury might also directly contribute to psychological and mental health outcomes. Neurocognitive deficits manifest across multiple cognitive domains. Moreover, impaired executive function and mental health can affect patients’ adherence to treatment. This review summarizes the current data on the impact of glycemic extremes on brain structure and cognitive function in youth with T1D and the use of new diabetes technologies that may reduce these complications.
“…[14][15][16] In adolescents with poor glycaemic control, a closed-loop system has been shown to increase the TIR without increasing hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis events. 17,18 An increasing number of studies have assessed hybrid closed-loop systems in children younger than 14 years; 17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] however, only a few studies have assessed hybrid closedloop systems under conditions resembling everyday life in the long-term, during day and night, in participants exclusively younger than 14 years in a parallel-group, randomised trial showing an improvement in the TIR without increasing hypoglycaemia. 22,25 The first-generation Diabeloop device (DBLG1; Diabeloop, Grenoble, France) is, to date, the only hybrid closed-loop system that allows customisation of several parameters according to the patient's physiology.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.