2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.23.20199604
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and immunogenicity of the Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine candidate: interim results of a phase 1/2a, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract: BACKGROUND The ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) might be controlled by an efficacious vaccine. Multiple vaccines are in development, but no efficacious vaccine is currently available. METHODS We designed a multi-center phase 1/2a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study to assesses the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S, a non-replicating adenovirus 26 based vector expressing the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
99
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(34 reference statements)
11
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although humoral immune responses were significantly higher in NHP that received the 1x10 11 vp dose as compared to recipients of the 5x10 10 vp vaccine dose, differences in neutralizing antibody levels decreased over time and do not suggest a clear benefit of the higher dose, in agreement with interim Phase 1/2a clinical data (Sadoff et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Although humoral immune responses were significantly higher in NHP that received the 1x10 11 vp dose as compared to recipients of the 5x10 10 vp vaccine dose, differences in neutralizing antibody levels decreased over time and do not suggest a clear benefit of the higher dose, in agreement with interim Phase 1/2a clinical data (Sadoff et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Antibodies against the ChAdOx1 vector are induced by the first vaccination but do not prevent boosting and are not further increased by the second vaccination with either a 4-week or 8-week interval. These observations are also important for further development of viral vectors in general, particularly as multiple vaccines are being developed that use the same viral vectors as those in development for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, including Ad26, Ad5 and ChAdOx1 2,3,[25][26][27] . T cell responses, here measured by IFN-γ ELISpot, were induced rapidly after vaccination and are well maintained in all dosing regimens and intervals between vaccinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of genetically modified organisms as vaccines dates back to the early 1980s [ 6 ] and has the advantage that the safety of the adenovirus vector at low doses is well established and likely to be transferable to new vaccines, although the vector has never been used in large numbers of older people with frailty. Janssen’s phase II trial included just 15 participants aged 65 and over, with rates of adverse events lower (36%) than in younger people (64%) [ 7 ]. More robust Phase II safety data have been published for the AstraZeneca vaccine, including 200 people aged 70 or over without severe comorbidities or frailty [ 8 ].…”
Section: Genetically Modified Organism (Virus Vector) Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%