In this issue of the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Andrikopolou et al.1 conducted a systematic review of the safety of vasodilatory stress tests using adenosine and regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). By searching SCOPUS with the predefined keywords, they selected 34 studies which include 22,957 patients. Among 34 studies, adenosine was used in 21 and regadenoson in 15, while both were used in two studies. The estimated incidence of overall and highgrade atrioventricular block (AVB) was 3.81% (95% CI 1.99%-6.19%) and 1.93% (95% CI 0.77%-3.59%), respectively. The incidence of AVB and high-grade AVB in adenosine group was 8.58% (95% CI 5.55%-12.21%) and 5.21% (95% CI 2.81%-8.30%), while that in regadenoson group was 0.30% (95% CI 0.04%-0.82%) and 0.05% (95% CI \ 0.001%-0.19%), respectively. They concluded that both overall and high-grade AVB are significantly less frequent with regadenoson compared to adenosine.Adenosine is a naturally occurring ligand of four distinct subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) of cell membrane G protein-coupled receptors. It produces coronary artery vasodilatation by activating adenylyl cyclase that results in the opening of potassium channels. The opening of these channels in vascular smooth muscle cells hyperpolarizes the cells and inhibits voltage-gated calcium channels and intracellular calcium release, resulting in relaxation.2 The common actions of adenosine on different types of adenosine receptors are associated with several life-threatening side effects. Actions on the A1 receptor can induce AVB, while actions on A2B and A3 receptors can induce bronchoconstriction especially in patients with asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The use of adenosine can be limited in a substantial number of patients as the prevalence of COPD can be found in 30% patients undergoing adenosine MPI.