2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of Two Types of Influenza Vaccination in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure S1). In a single patient (1.6%) (10,26,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Furthermore, our data confirm and extend the results of the single study which analyzed postvaccinal HLA antibodies and showed that in heart transplant recipients no significant donor-specific allosensitization was induced by influenza vaccination (30).…”
Section: Anti-influenza Antibodiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Figure S1). In a single patient (1.6%) (10,26,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Furthermore, our data confirm and extend the results of the single study which analyzed postvaccinal HLA antibodies and showed that in heart transplant recipients no significant donor-specific allosensitization was induced by influenza vaccination (30).…”
Section: Anti-influenza Antibodiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…No clinical evidence for rejection or graft dysfunction following immunization has been reported in studies that have specifically looked at this outcome (31,34,(58)(59)(60). Three studies have investigated the development of donor specific antibodies (DSA) after vaccination.…”
Section: Effects Of Vaccination Including Allograft Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] Its safety and efficacy in liver transplant and other solid-organ recipients have been proven in several studies. 19,[21][22][23][24][25] Although our case suggests that GBS may occur in liver transplant recipients after influenza vaccination, the very low incidence of vaccine-associated GBS, the significantly increased complications from influenza virus infection in solid organ recipients, and the rise of influenza drug resistance make influenza vaccination the first-line strategy for influenza virus infection prevention in solid-organ recipients. 26,27 This fact is supported by the current guidelines for vaccination of solid-organ recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%