2018
DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of peri-operative administration of hydroxyethyl starch in children undergoing surgery

Abstract: Intravascular volume expansion with low molecular weight 6% HES did not appear to modify renal function, blood loss or transfusion when administered to children during the peri-operative period. However, given the lack of statistical power and the very low GRADE quality of evidence, more high-quality RCTs are needed to explore these outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also decided not to use hydroxyethyl starch for priming the CPB circuit due to the lack of evidence and absence of high-quality randomized controlled trials showing the safety and efficacy of hydroxyethyl starch use in children. 16 In addition, an in vitro study showed a pronounced inhibitory effect on coagulation parameters detected by the ROTEM test when colloids were compared with crystalloids. 17 Second, in our study all the caregivers (except the perfusionist) were blinded to the study solution, which is an important aspect when it comes to deciding to transfuse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also decided not to use hydroxyethyl starch for priming the CPB circuit due to the lack of evidence and absence of high-quality randomized controlled trials showing the safety and efficacy of hydroxyethyl starch use in children. 16 In addition, an in vitro study showed a pronounced inhibitory effect on coagulation parameters detected by the ROTEM test when colloids were compared with crystalloids. 17 Second, in our study all the caregivers (except the perfusionist) were blinded to the study solution, which is an important aspect when it comes to deciding to transfuse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Most centers used albumin or the association of albumin and gela- supposed to provide a greater vascular feeling effect despite the fact that some evidences are not supporting this practice. [23][24][25] Mismatch of donor and recipient size and weights and the resulting divergent hemodynamic requirements is an issue specific to pediatric transplantation. 19 As such, the monitoring and hemodynamic management sections are probably the most interesting aspects of this survey, demonstrating significant variability between centers in hemodynamic monitoring and therapeutic responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macromolecules are usually used in France when a vascular feeling is needed (either as a first‐line treatment or after crystalloid administration). Both albumin and gelatins are supposed to provide a greater vascular feeling effect despite the fact that some evidences are not supporting this practice …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis opined that intravascular volume expansion with low molecular weight 6% HES did not appear to modify renal function, blood loss or transfusion when administered to children during the peri-operative period. [37] However, since the quality of evidence was low, the authors recommended conduct of high-quality RCTs to study their effect in children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%