2021
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.603679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Tigertriever as a Rescue Device After Failed Aspiration—Single Center Experience

Abstract: Introduction: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new stent retriever—Tigertriever—after failed aspiration.Materials and Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with Tigertriever between January 2018 and March 2020 were included in the study. Treatment results of Tigertriever in rescue therapy (after failed aspiration) were evaluated. Periprocedural data were retrospectively analyzed.Results: Thirty patients were treated with Tigertriever (14M/16F). There were 20 rescue thrombectomies after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Piasecki et al report on an first pass success rate of 55% using the Tigertriever™ as a rescue therapy in 20 cases. 23 The Tigertriever™ uses manual expansion and contraction of the stent by movement of a core wire connected to a handle, 23 which is an alternative method to achieve an enhanced wall-stent apposition. Akpinar et al report on a first pass success rate of 56.8% using the NeVa™ thrombectomy device as a first line thrombectomy device in 118 cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Piasecki et al report on an first pass success rate of 55% using the Tigertriever™ as a rescue therapy in 20 cases. 23 The Tigertriever™ uses manual expansion and contraction of the stent by movement of a core wire connected to a handle, 23 which is an alternative method to achieve an enhanced wall-stent apposition. Akpinar et al report on a first pass success rate of 56.8% using the NeVa™ thrombectomy device as a first line thrombectomy device in 118 cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases of failure were all related to failed attempts to remove the thrombus, which is similar to our experiences with the NSR. 23 In one case of a severe calcified thrombus, the NSR was ineffective because it was not possible to pinch it to the microcatheter ostium. However, subsequent MT was successful using a CSR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%