2022
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of istaroxime in patients with acute heart failure‐related pre‐cardiogenic shock – a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study (SEISMiC)

Abstract: Aims We examined the effects of istaroxime in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) related Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) stage B pre‐cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods and results Sixty patients with AHF without acute myocardial infarction with pre‐CS, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg without hypoperfusion, venous lactate ≥2 mmol/L and/or mechanical or inotropic support, were randomized to istaroxime 1.0–1.5 μg/kg/min or placebo for 24 h. The prima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 24 h infusion has shown beneficial changes in echocardiography parameters, with a lack of major cardiac adverse effects in the acute HF patients’ cohort. These results are in line with the recent study by Metra et al, where the inotropic effect of istaroxime increased cardiac index with blood pressure changes and reduced left ventricular and atrial dimensions [ 193 ]. Interestingly, istaroxime shows less cardiotoxic and arrhythmogenic properties alongside significant inotropic effects than classical inotropes [ 194 ].…”
Section: Combination Of Mechanical Unloading and Pharmacotherapy For ...supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The 24 h infusion has shown beneficial changes in echocardiography parameters, with a lack of major cardiac adverse effects in the acute HF patients’ cohort. These results are in line with the recent study by Metra et al, where the inotropic effect of istaroxime increased cardiac index with blood pressure changes and reduced left ventricular and atrial dimensions [ 193 ]. Interestingly, istaroxime shows less cardiotoxic and arrhythmogenic properties alongside significant inotropic effects than classical inotropes [ 194 ].…”
Section: Combination Of Mechanical Unloading and Pharmacotherapy For ...supporting
confidence: 93%
“…cardiac index, LA area, and LV end-systolic volume) and was well tolerated. 364 Procalcitonin-guided initiation of antibiotic therapy did not improve clinical outcomes compared with standard of care in 742 patients admitted for acute HF. 365…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Phase 2a SEISMIC study, including patients with pre‐CS, istaroxime improved BP and echocardiography measures related to HF (i.e. cardiac index, LA area, and LV end‐systolic volume) and was well tolerated 364 …”
Section: Acute Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Istaroxime has improved diastolic and systolic cardiac function among patients hospitalized for acute HFrEF 33 . The phase 2a SEISMiC trial randomized 60 patients with acute HF with pre‐cardiogenic shock, defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg without hypoperfusion, venous lactate ≥2 mmol/L and/or mechanical or inotropic support, to istaroxime 1.0–1.5 μg/kg/min or placebo for 24 h. Istaroxime improved systolic blood pressure without significant differences in serious adverse events or adverse events except for more nausea, vomiting and infusion site pain in the istaroxime‐treated patients 34 …”
Section: Acute Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 μg/kg/min or placebo for 24 h. Istaroxime improved systolic blood pressure without significant differences in serious adverse events or adverse events except for more nausea, vomiting and infusion site pain in the istaroxime-treated patients. 34 Early assessment of urinary sodium (UNa) concentration can be useful to assess intrinsic renal sodium avidity (IRSA). 35 Patients with a random UNa spot sample before randomization from the ROSE-AHF trial were categorized according to tertiles of UNa as high (range 19-40 mmol/L), intermediate (range 41-68 mmol/L), or low (range 69-139 mmol/L) IRSA.…”
Section: Acute Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%