2004
DOI: 10.1155/2004/823084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy of HFA‐134a Beclomethasone Dipropionate Extra‐Fine Aerosol over Six Months

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the systemic safety and efficacy of hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extra-fine aerosol 800 µg/day with chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-BDP 1500 µg/day.DESIGN: Six-month, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy study.PATIENTS: Patients (n=141) with moderate to severe asthma adequately controlled by CFC-BDP 1000 µg/day to 2000 µg/day.INTERVENTIONS: Patients received CFC-BDP 1500 µg/day during a two-week run-in period and were then randomized to either HFA-BDP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(10;12;15-17) Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the short-term efficacy of efBDP and efCIC to that of conventional ICS found that the extra-fine formulation offered equivalent efficacy when administered at half the dose of conventional ICS. (18)(19)(20)(21) Indeed, a rigorous dose response study has confirmed that efBDP provides significantly greater effects on lung function than comparable doses of CFC-BDP (22) and the improvements in asthma symptoms and quality of life recorded in 6-and 12-month RCTs although not statistically significant tended to be better with efBDP than CFC-BDP at twice the dose, (23)(24)(25) suggesting that there may be clinically meaningful differences between the extra-fine particle and larger particle formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(10;12;15-17) Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the short-term efficacy of efBDP and efCIC to that of conventional ICS found that the extra-fine formulation offered equivalent efficacy when administered at half the dose of conventional ICS. (18)(19)(20)(21) Indeed, a rigorous dose response study has confirmed that efBDP provides significantly greater effects on lung function than comparable doses of CFC-BDP (22) and the improvements in asthma symptoms and quality of life recorded in 6-and 12-month RCTs although not statistically significant tended to be better with efBDP than CFC-BDP at twice the dose, (23)(24)(25) suggesting that there may be clinically meaningful differences between the extra-fine particle and larger particle formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, RCTs likely do not capture the effects of suboptimal adherence as well as of poor inhaler technique that are commonplace in realworld practice [16]. Nonetheless, in 6-month and 12month RCTs, improvements in asthma symptoms and quality of life tended to be better with EF HFA-BDP than CFC-BDP at twice the dose [17][18][19], suggesting that there may be clinically meaningful differences between the EFparticle and large-particle formulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFA formulations of salbutamol have been judged comparable with those containing CFCs (48–51). However, HFA beclomethasone has proved effective and less toxic at lower doses: the dose equivalence between HFA‐beclomethasone and CFC‐beclomethasone is approximately 2 to 1 (52–59). Thus, the number of puffs per day for HFA‐beclomethasone (Fig.…”
Section: Improving Access To Affordable Medicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%