2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of early amino acids in preterm <28 weeks gestation: prospective observational comparison

Abstract: Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of early amino acid (AA) administration in preterm neonates <28 weeks gestational age.Study design: Prospective data collection for 1 year for the late AA group (AA started at 12-30 h) and for another year with practice change to early AA administration (immediately after stabilization).Results: Time of initiation of AA differed (early group 4±3 h vs late group 20±6 h; P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of clinically signi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,[7][8][9] Other investigations have also described an association between cholestasis and the quantity and formulation of amino acids administered parenterally, excess caloric intake of fats and carbohydrates, 10,11 toxicity of trace minerals, [12][13][14][15][16] male gender, 17 perinatal asphyxia, 18 phototoxicity of multivitamin 2 Aggressive administration of parenteral amino acids to improve protein accretion rates in very preterm neonates has been supported in the literature. [24][25][26][27] Although tolerance of high-dose amino acids has been described, researchers acknowledge that sensitive tests to monitor amino-acid toxicity are not readily available in the clinical setting. 25,28 Our study results are consistent with previous reports that associate cholestasis with increased duration of parenteral nutrition and higher cumulative dose of amino acids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,[7][8][9] Other investigations have also described an association between cholestasis and the quantity and formulation of amino acids administered parenterally, excess caloric intake of fats and carbohydrates, 10,11 toxicity of trace minerals, [12][13][14][15][16] male gender, 17 perinatal asphyxia, 18 phototoxicity of multivitamin 2 Aggressive administration of parenteral amino acids to improve protein accretion rates in very preterm neonates has been supported in the literature. [24][25][26][27] Although tolerance of high-dose amino acids has been described, researchers acknowledge that sensitive tests to monitor amino-acid toxicity are not readily available in the clinical setting. 25,28 Our study results are consistent with previous reports that associate cholestasis with increased duration of parenteral nutrition and higher cumulative dose of amino acids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Postnatal growth restriction can occur because of inadequate nutritional intake, increased energy demands with concomitant protein deficits and administration of drugs (diuretics and steroids). [3][4][5][6] Malnutrition at a vulnerable period of brain development adversely influences long-term developmental outcomes through decreased numbers of brain cells. [7][8][9] Malnutrition directly affects the child's energy level, rate of motor development and rate of growth, thus interfering with neurodevelopment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found no clinically significant associations between protein intake and degree of acidosis or BUN. 23 Ridout et al retrospectively evaluated 121 neonates with birth weight <1250 g who received exclusive parenteral nutrition in the first 3 days of life providing amino-acid intakes up to 3.7 g/kg/day. They found no association between BUN and protein intake in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%