2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and Efficacy Compared between Irinotecan-Loaded Microspheres HepaSphere and DC Bead in a Model of VX2 Liver Metastases in the Rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 In an in vivo model, HepaSphere® was shown to induce higher local concentration of anticancer drug compared with DC bead. 37 Furthermore, we could not show the differences of antitumor effect between epirubicin and arterial cisplatin in the present study. Anticancer effects with different DEBs or eluting anticancer drugs for c-TACE refractory should be confirmed in further studies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 72%
“…36 In an in vivo model, HepaSphere® was shown to induce higher local concentration of anticancer drug compared with DC bead. 37 Furthermore, we could not show the differences of antitumor effect between epirubicin and arterial cisplatin in the present study. Anticancer effects with different DEBs or eluting anticancer drugs for c-TACE refractory should be confirmed in further studies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 72%
“…This study measured plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38 followed by sacrifice of the test animals 3 days post embolization treatment for tissue assessment [108]. Both spheres at the smallest size range available were used.…”
Section: Commercially Available Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth, there are limited DOX toxicology data for VX2 cells on which to base (8). In 2015, Namur et al reported that embolization with irinotecan-loaded microspheres resulted in greater necrosis in rabbit VX2 tumors than that with microspheres containing no chemotherapy agents (50%-69% vs 22%, respectively), although this difference was not significant (31). From a clinical standpoint, Malagari et al demonstrated superior tumor response with the addition of DOX to DEB therapy in a 2010 prospective randomized study of 84 patients with HCC (10).…”
Section: Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%