Abstract:Introduction Cardiovascular disease is an important factor in the mortality and morbidity of patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis. Although mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may have potential benefits on the cardiovascular system, their safety for patients on hemodialysis remains unclear, considering the differences between the results of already performed clinical trials. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed databases were searched for relevant clinica… Show more
“…We noticed that previous published meta-analyses omitted important trials (e.g., there are only five RCTs in Zhao’s work ( Zhao et al, 2016 )), Zhao’s conclusion that MRA did not increase potassium levels significantly, this is consistent with our result. However, they did not analyze the effect of MRA on serum potassium in patients with different dialysis methods, we did a subgroup analysis specifically for this question.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Notably, the risk/benefit ratio of MRAs in dialysis patients is less well defined, owing to concerns that their cardioprotective actions may be counteracted by excess risk of hyperkalemia ( Georgianos et al, 2017 ). Moreover, patients with end-stage renal disease often experience multiple complications, consequently, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) should be considered for complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) ( Zhao et al, 2016 ). MRA, including eplerenone and spironolactone, have been shown effective in patients with hypertension and HFrEF ( Pitt et al, 1999 ; Zannad et al, 2011 ).…”
Whether Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) reduce mortality and cardiovascular effects of dialysis patients remains unclear. A meta-analysis was designed to investigate whether MRA reduce mortality and cardiovascular effects of dialysis patients, with a registration in INPLASY (INPLASY2020120143). The meta-analysis revealed that MRA significantly reduced all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular mortality (CVM). Patients receiving MRA presented improved left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). There was no significant difference in the serum potassium level between the MRA group and the placebo group. MRA vs. control exerts definite survival and cardiovascular benefits in dialysis patients, including reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, LVMI, and arterial blood pressure, and improving LVEF. In terms of safety, MRA did not increase serum potassium levels for dialysis patients with safety.Systematic Review Registration: (https://inplasy.com/inplasy-protocol-1239-2/), identifier (INPLASY2020120143).
“…We noticed that previous published meta-analyses omitted important trials (e.g., there are only five RCTs in Zhao’s work ( Zhao et al, 2016 )), Zhao’s conclusion that MRA did not increase potassium levels significantly, this is consistent with our result. However, they did not analyze the effect of MRA on serum potassium in patients with different dialysis methods, we did a subgroup analysis specifically for this question.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Notably, the risk/benefit ratio of MRAs in dialysis patients is less well defined, owing to concerns that their cardioprotective actions may be counteracted by excess risk of hyperkalemia ( Georgianos et al, 2017 ). Moreover, patients with end-stage renal disease often experience multiple complications, consequently, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) should be considered for complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) ( Zhao et al, 2016 ). MRA, including eplerenone and spironolactone, have been shown effective in patients with hypertension and HFrEF ( Pitt et al, 1999 ; Zannad et al, 2011 ).…”
Whether Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) reduce mortality and cardiovascular effects of dialysis patients remains unclear. A meta-analysis was designed to investigate whether MRA reduce mortality and cardiovascular effects of dialysis patients, with a registration in INPLASY (INPLASY2020120143). The meta-analysis revealed that MRA significantly reduced all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular mortality (CVM). Patients receiving MRA presented improved left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). There was no significant difference in the serum potassium level between the MRA group and the placebo group. MRA vs. control exerts definite survival and cardiovascular benefits in dialysis patients, including reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, LVMI, and arterial blood pressure, and improving LVEF. In terms of safety, MRA did not increase serum potassium levels for dialysis patients with safety.Systematic Review Registration: (https://inplasy.com/inplasy-protocol-1239-2/), identifier (INPLASY2020120143).
“…From a clinical perspective, a direct association between intestinal MR and BP has not been established to date; however, several interesting studies have assessed the efficiency and safety of MR antagonists in dialysis patients 40, 41. In some, but not all, of these studies, BP improvement was observed using MR antagonists.…”
BackgroundMineralocorticoid receptor (MR) has pathological roles in various cell types, including renal tubule cells, myocytes, and smooth muscle cells; however, the role of MR in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) has not been sufficiently evaluated. The intestine is the sensing organ of ingested sodium; accordingly, intestinal MR is expected to have essential roles in blood pressure (BP) regulation.Methods and ResultsWe generated IEC‐specific MR knockout (IEC‐MR‐KO) mice. With a standard diet, fecal sodium excretion was 1.5‐fold higher in IEC‐MR‐KO mice, with markedly decreased colonic expression of β‐ and γ‐epithelial sodium channel, than in control mice. Urinary sodium excretion in IEC‐MR‐KO mice decreased by 30%, maintaining sodium balance; however, a low‐salt diet caused significant reductions in body weight and BP in IEC‐MR‐KO mice, and plasma aldosterone exhibited a compensatory increase. With a high‐salt diet, intestinal sodium absorption markedly increased to similar levels in both genotypes, without an elevation in BP. Deoxycorticosterone/salt treatment elevated BP and increased intestinal sodium absorption in both genotypes. Notably, the increase in BP was significantly smaller in IEC‐MR‐KO mice than in control mice. The addition of the MR antagonist spironolactone to deoxycorticosterone/salt treatment eliminated the differences in BP and intestinal sodium absorption between genotypes.ConclusionsIntestinal MR regulates intestinal sodium absorption in the colon and contributes to BP regulation. These regulatory effects are associated with variation in epithelial sodium channel expression. These findings suggest that intestinal MR is a new target for studying the molecular mechanism of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.