2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and benefits of antenatal oral iron supplementation in low‐income countries: a review

Abstract: SummaryThe World Health Organization recommends universal iron supplementation of 30–60 mg/day in pregnancy but coverage is low in most countries. Its efficacy is uncertain, however, and there has been a vigorous debate in the last decade about its safety, particularly in areas with a high burden of malaria and other infectious diseases. We reviewed the evidence on the safety and efficacy of antenatal iron supplementation in low‐income countries. We found no evidence that daily supplementation at a dose of 60 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the strain of mouse used for most of these studies has been C57BI/6 mice, which has a nonfunctional allele of Nramp1, a divalent metal (iron and manganese) transporter that renders them more susceptible to infections (Canonne-Hergaux et al, 1999; Fritsche et al, 2012; Loomis et al, 2014; Powell and Frelinger, 2017; Soe-Lin et al, 2009). In humans, clinical data support our findings that dietary iron supplementation provides beneficial outcomes, especially in developing countries where low iron status may be prevalent (Loukas et al, 2016; Mwangi et al, 2017; Oppenheimer, 1989, 1998, 2001). However in malaria endemic areas, iron supplementation was associated with a negative outcome for patients (Clark et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is important to note that the strain of mouse used for most of these studies has been C57BI/6 mice, which has a nonfunctional allele of Nramp1, a divalent metal (iron and manganese) transporter that renders them more susceptible to infections (Canonne-Hergaux et al, 1999; Fritsche et al, 2012; Loomis et al, 2014; Powell and Frelinger, 2017; Soe-Lin et al, 2009). In humans, clinical data support our findings that dietary iron supplementation provides beneficial outcomes, especially in developing countries where low iron status may be prevalent (Loukas et al, 2016; Mwangi et al, 2017; Oppenheimer, 1989, 1998, 2001). However in malaria endemic areas, iron supplementation was associated with a negative outcome for patients (Clark et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In pregnant women at risk for malaria, concern has been raised about oral iron increasing the risk for this infection [15]. Iron is crucial for supporting growth of pathogenic organisms such as malaria, and early studies suggested that iron supplementation may increase the risk of this infection.…”
Section: Risks Of Oral Ironmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a second recent placebo controlled trial in non-iron deficient, non-anaemic, pregnant women in Tanzania, iron supplementation did not increase placental malaria, although no benefit on birth weight or gestation duration was found, perhaps reflecting higher baseline iron status in this study population 42. These trials indicate that antenatal iron supplementation is safe even where malaria is highly endemic and malaria control strategies incompletely implemented (perhaps because of more developed host immunity and/or tolerance to pathogen load in adulthood),43 and has important benefits on maternal and neonatal health when iron deficiency is prevalent. Detailed investigations of potential risks from iron in pregnancy on other infections are still warranted.…”
Section: New Insights Into Iron-infection Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 64%