2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70128-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and activity of the anti-CD79B antibody–drug conjugate polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 1 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
207
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
15
207
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a recent clinical trial using anti-CD79B antibody conjugate as a single agent or combined with rituximab had no clinical effect in CLL, but had an objective response in 14 of 24 DLBCL patients, and 6 of 7 patients with MCL. 59 The difference between CLL and MCL for a-BCR-induced signaling is striking, given that MCL and CLL are the 2 types of B-cell malignancies that respond clinically to the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib. [25][26][27][28] Ibrutinib might work in CLL by downregulating the constitutive BCR signaling that seems important for survival of CLL cells, whereas ibrutinib may work in MCL by inhibiting the potentiated BCR signaling characteristic of this malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a recent clinical trial using anti-CD79B antibody conjugate as a single agent or combined with rituximab had no clinical effect in CLL, but had an objective response in 14 of 24 DLBCL patients, and 6 of 7 patients with MCL. 59 The difference between CLL and MCL for a-BCR-induced signaling is striking, given that MCL and CLL are the 2 types of B-cell malignancies that respond clinically to the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib. [25][26][27][28] Ibrutinib might work in CLL by downregulating the constitutive BCR signaling that seems important for survival of CLL cells, whereas ibrutinib may work in MCL by inhibiting the potentiated BCR signaling characteristic of this malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 However, the reduced uptake of cys-mcMMAF into nontargeted cells may mitigate toxicity, which could explain why SGN-CD19A shows reduced myelosuppression, minimal neuropathy, and improved overall tolerability when compared with other ADCs. 12,45 SGN-CD19B, on the other hand, offers the potential for robust activity against refractory B-cell malignancies but may induce more myelosuppression than SGN-CD19A. 12 We would not expect patients treated with SGN-CD19B to experience the ocular symptoms associated with certain auristatin and maytansine payloads 46 because these reversible ocular events are caused by nonantigen mediated uptake of ADC and are not associated with the PBD payload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a phase I study, this drug was administrated at escalating dose from 0.1 to 2.4 mg/kg for 34 NHL and 18 CLL patients [22]. The recommended dose for phase 2 trial was 2.4 mg/kg as a single agent and in combination with rituximab.…”
Section: Polatuzumab Vedotinmentioning
confidence: 99%