2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icsa.2019.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Analysis Method for Cooperative Driving Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case study, we found 15 FSRs from the cooperative perspective, making up 48% of all FSRs. Our results corroborate the existing body of knowledge [17,38,46] in showing that the current safety standard misses FSRs from the cooperative perspective.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our case study, we found 15 FSRs from the cooperative perspective, making up 48% of all FSRs. Our results corroborate the existing body of knowledge [17,38,46] in showing that the current safety standard misses FSRs from the cooperative perspective.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Clearly, replications are required to verify the generalizability and scalability of our method. Nonetheless, our results corroborate the existing body of knowledge [17,38,46] in showing that the current safety standard FSRs from the cooperative perspective. The results of our case study show better coverage of safety goals by providing additional FSRs as compared to the ISO 26262 process [28].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) design methodology is a crucial lever for complex cooperative automated vehicle system design. In general, many errors come from the requirements phase of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) [6]. In order to avoid requirement errors, good system software must be well designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%