Safeguarding SMEs dynamic capabilities in technology innovative SME-large company partnerships in South Africa

Abstract

This paper focuses on technological collaboration between small and large firms. It is argued that such collaborations can be beneficial for both types of partner, but that small firms often are confronted by the hazards of collaboration as these relationships are typically asymmetric. As a result of this, knowledge embodied in the dynamic (strategic, internal and external) capabilities of SMEs can flow unintentionally to the larger partner.If this occurs, the collaboration would be less successful from the SMEs' point of view.Next, it is proposed that the use of formal and informal safeguards can protect technology innovative SMEs against such knowledge flows. This paper examines to what extent is the number of dynamic capabilities of SMEs associated with partnership success and to what extent is this relationship influenced by the number of safeguards used by the SMEs? A sample of 43 technology innovative SMEs was interviewed by means of a structured questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between the number of dynamic capabilities on the one hand and partnership success on the other. Moreover, the impact of (in)formal safeguards on this relationship openUP was analyzed. The research found that SME's strategic and internal capabilities are negatively associated with partnership success, whereas external capabilities are positively related. The inclusion of safeguards turned out to produce the hypothesized effects. The paper shows, therefore, that unintentional knowledge flows from the SME to the larger partner can be prevented by putting in place formal and informal protection mechanisms.

The Impact of Managerial and Adaptive Capabilities to Stimulate Organizational Innovation in SMEs: A Complementary PLS–SEM Approach

“…However, most of the literature on dynamic and organizational capabilities consists of descriptive studies rather than empirical findings [4,6,[14][15][16][17][18]. The majority of empirical studies are case studies [15,19,20]. Empirical studies that feature more quantitative approaches are still needed to provide more academic rigor to this concept, especially in developing countries.…”

RD activity and operating performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): The case of a small open economy

“…However, innovation is very expensive for SMEs, given their constraints in terms of internal resources such as technology, finance, marketing and human resources (Kumar and Subrahmanya, 2010;Sawers et al, 2008). Consequently, the benefits from Aggelopoulos et al 41 innovation should clearly outweigh its costs and risks.…”

Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: the innovation hub case

“…That this is a relevant issue in the South African context is shown in several studies. Sawers, Pretorius and Oerlemans (2008) stated that there are unintentional knowledge flows from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to their larger partners in South Africa. In the study 'Industrial innovation in South Africa, 1998' by Oerlemans et al (2004, it is shown that many South African innovative firms benefit from this type of knowledge flow, which results in an imitation type of innovative behaviour.…”