Abstract:In recent years, access to safe drinking water has been a major problem in many countries in the world. The scarcity of safe drinking water is increasing due to increase in population, changing lifestyles and urbanization. Bangladesh, known as the “land of water,” also faces a safe drinking water crisis. Particularly, the Southwestern part of Bangladesh experiences scarcity of safe drinking water due to salinity intrusion along with arsenic‐contaminated groundwater and recurring drought. In this context, an ex… Show more
“…Khulna and Satkhira districts are located in the southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh with a population of 6.2 million (Abedin and Shaw 2013a). This area experiences severe drinking water scarcity due to salinity intrusion, arsenic, and drought (Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the DPHE of Rupsha upazila is continuously working to screen arsenic contaminated tube wells to provide safe drinking water at the community level, whereas Debhata upazila establishes shallow and deep tube wells and constructs community-based arsenic and iron removal plants through institutions such as DPHE and a local company named Delta. On the other hand, Dacope and Shymnagar upazilas have severe potable water problems due to insufficient safe surface and groundwater sources, inadequate infrastructure, lack of budget resources, and poor salinity and arsenic policies at the upazila level (Abedin and Shaw 2013a).…”
One of the most serious resource and health issues in coastal communities of Bangladesh is the scarcity of safe drinking water, triggered by the combined effects of salinity, arsenic, and drought. This article explores community perception of vulnerabilities in daily life, livelihood, and environment, and investigates how communities and institutions cope with or adapt to drinking water scarcity. This study outlines community expectations for support from government and nongovernment organizations to overcome this problem. The findings reveal that nearly all respondents from the drinking water scarcity area perceive that salinity is the primary reason for the lack of safe drinking water compared to arsenic and drought hazards. Despite a number of socioeconomic factors and a geographical location that aggravates the coastal communities' vulnerability, these communities have established their own adaptation mechanism to cope with this crisis. Government and nongovernment organizations have also supported community efforts to cope with the problem. By emphasizing both community adaptation methods and efforts of institutions, this article illustrates an integrated community-based approach, which would be effective for reducing drinking water scarcity in the southwestern coastal region of the country.
“…Khulna and Satkhira districts are located in the southwestern coastal region of Bangladesh with a population of 6.2 million (Abedin and Shaw 2013a). This area experiences severe drinking water scarcity due to salinity intrusion, arsenic, and drought (Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the DPHE of Rupsha upazila is continuously working to screen arsenic contaminated tube wells to provide safe drinking water at the community level, whereas Debhata upazila establishes shallow and deep tube wells and constructs community-based arsenic and iron removal plants through institutions such as DPHE and a local company named Delta. On the other hand, Dacope and Shymnagar upazilas have severe potable water problems due to insufficient safe surface and groundwater sources, inadequate infrastructure, lack of budget resources, and poor salinity and arsenic policies at the upazila level (Abedin and Shaw 2013a).…”
One of the most serious resource and health issues in coastal communities of Bangladesh is the scarcity of safe drinking water, triggered by the combined effects of salinity, arsenic, and drought. This article explores community perception of vulnerabilities in daily life, livelihood, and environment, and investigates how communities and institutions cope with or adapt to drinking water scarcity. This study outlines community expectations for support from government and nongovernment organizations to overcome this problem. The findings reveal that nearly all respondents from the drinking water scarcity area perceive that salinity is the primary reason for the lack of safe drinking water compared to arsenic and drought hazards. Despite a number of socioeconomic factors and a geographical location that aggravates the coastal communities' vulnerability, these communities have established their own adaptation mechanism to cope with this crisis. Government and nongovernment organizations have also supported community efforts to cope with the problem. By emphasizing both community adaptation methods and efforts of institutions, this article illustrates an integrated community-based approach, which would be effective for reducing drinking water scarcity in the southwestern coastal region of the country.
“…For instance, aftermath consecutive two mega disasters viz. Sidr in 2007 and Aila in 2009 in the southwest coast of Bangladesh, government and other organizations worked on safe drinking water supply with the assistance of international organizations in the southwest Bangladesh (Abedin and Shaw, 2014). Hence, networking may play an important role to minimize the duplicity of work to provide maximum benefits for the victims.…”
Section: Major Obstacles Of Networking To Harmonize the Disaster Riskmentioning
“…To reduce the risk of waterborne disease rainwater harvesting and groundwater has been widely promoted over surface water 6,7 . The aquifers in the southwest coastal districts of Khulna, Bagerhat and Satkhira are frequently saline, providing brackish water that greatly hinders freshwater access for the surrounding communities [8][9][10] .…”
Managed aquifer recharge (MAR), a hydro-geological intervention designed to dilute groundwater salinity, pumps pond water treated through a slow sand filter into the underground aquifers. We evaluated the microbiological safety of the resulting MAR water at sites from three districts in southwest coastal Bangladesh. We collected monthly paired pond-MAR water samples from July 2016-June 2017 and enumerated fecal coliforms and E. coli using the IDEXX quanti-tray technique, by the most probable number (MPN) method. We used WHO risk categories for microbiological quality; no risk (<1 MPN), low risk (1-10 MPN) and moderate to high risk (>10 MPN per 100 mL water). We estimated the difference in mean log10 MPN in pond and MAR water using linear mixed effect models with random intercepts and cluster adjusted robust standard error. Almost all pond water samples (292/299, 98%) had moderate-to high-risk level (>10 MPN) fecal coliforms and E. coli (283/299, 95%). In contrast, 81% (242/300) of MAR water samples had no or low risk level fecal coliforms (0-10 MPN), of which 60% (179/300) had no fecal coliforms. We detected no or low risk level E. coli in 94% (283/300) of MAR water samples of these 80% (240/300) had no E. coli. MAR samples had lower mean log10 MPN fecal coliforms (-2.37; 95% CI: -2.56, -2.19) and E. coli (-2.26; 95% CI: -2.43, -2.09) than pond water; microbial reductions remained consistent during the wet (May-October) and dry seasons. MAR-systems provided water with reduced fecal indicator bacteria compared to infiltered pond water.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.