2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2019.8813803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe Reinforcement Learning with Scene Decomposition for Navigating Complex Urban Environments

Abstract: Navigating urban environments represents a complex task for automated vehicles. They must reach their goal safely and efficiently while considering a multitude of traffic participants. We propose a modular decision making algorithm to autonomously navigate intersections, addressing challenges of existing rule-based and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. We first present a safe RL algorithm relying on a model-checker to ensure safety guarantees. To make the decision strategy robust to perception errors and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One method to alter the action selection process is to prioritize actions that are estimated to be safer [3]. However, this approach does not prove the nonexistence of unsafe behaviors.…”
Section: A Modification Of Exploration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One method to alter the action selection process is to prioritize actions that are estimated to be safer [3]. However, this approach does not prove the nonexistence of unsafe behaviors.…”
Section: A Modification Of Exploration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches have been proposed to increase the safety of RL methods by modifying the optimality criterion [1], [2] or by verifying the exploration processes with external guidance [3]- [10]. By modifying the optimality objective, agents behave more cautious than those trained without a risk measure included in the objective; however, the absence of unsafe behaviors cannot be proven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different strategy is followed by [35], where the authors defined a custom set of traffic rules based on the environment, the driver, and the road graph. With these rules, a RL driver learns to safely make lane-changing decisions, where the driver's decision making is combined with the formal safety verification of the rules, to ensure that only safe actions are taken by the driver A similar approach is considered in [7], where the authors replaced the formal safety verification with a learnable safety belief module, as part of the driver's policy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of simulations and synthetic data [5] for training have allowed to assess neural networks capabilities in many different realistic environments and different degrees of complexity. Many driving simulators have been designed, from the low-level ones that allow the drivers to control the hand brake of their car [6], to higher-level ones, in which the drivers can control their car acceleration and lane-change [7]. Some simulators model the traffic in an urban road network [8], some others model car's intersection access [9][10][11][12], or roundabout insertion [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RL provides a flexibility in the choice of the interaction model. RL has been applied to a variety of driving scenarios such as lane changing [10], or intersection navigation [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%