2019
DOI: 10.2478/dim-2019-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe Open Science for Restricted Data

Abstract: Open science is prompting wide efforts to make data from research available for broader use. However, sharing data is complicated by important protections on the data (e.g., protections of privacy and intellectual property). The spectrum of options existing between data needing to be fully open access and data that simply cannot be shared at all is quite limited. This paper puts forth a generalized remote secure enclave as a socio-technical framework consisting of policies, human processes, and technologies th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there is a need to continue to address the risks and rewards of "Big Data" for social science research (Mills, 2018), especially the extent to Mhaidli et al | 13 which increased computational computing capabilities undermine statistical-method-grounded methods for protecting data privacy and confidentiality. Finally, there are possible avenues of research in understanding of restricted social science data archives from a "socio-technical framework" perspective (Plale et al, 2019). The Researcher Passport described in this paper is an example of such a "socio-technical framework" through which one can understand restricted social science data archives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there is a need to continue to address the risks and rewards of "Big Data" for social science research (Mills, 2018), especially the extent to Mhaidli et al | 13 which increased computational computing capabilities undermine statistical-method-grounded methods for protecting data privacy and confidentiality. Finally, there are possible avenues of research in understanding of restricted social science data archives from a "socio-technical framework" perspective (Plale et al, 2019). The Researcher Passport described in this paper is an example of such a "socio-technical framework" through which one can understand restricted social science data archives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then processed the files to be extracted as word frequency data. Working within the HTRC capsule (Plale et al, 2019), we first downloaded individual page files using the preloaded functions in the HTRC Workset Toolkit to remove running page headers and footers. For each volume, we concatenated individual page files into a single document.…”
Section: Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Licensed, restricted, and controlled access to particular data, complying with Personal Data Protection and Intellectual Property laws and regulations [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Open Science Data Characteristics and Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• OS data has intrinsic (inherent) value, some data has the potential to be commercially valuable [20].…”
Section: Open Science Data Characteristics and Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%