2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574710000706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe physical human–robot interaction of mobility assistance robots: evaluation index and control

Abstract: Independent mobility is one of the major challenges for elderly. Assistive robots must guarantee user's safety. Existing methods to quantitatively express user's safety are not applicable to mobility assistance robots due to physical attachment. This paper proposes a danger index to estimate user's safety during mobility assistance. The formulation and validation of the index is achieved through extensive subjective and objective experimentation. A motion control method is also introduced that uses the propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of safety provision during each of the assistance levels, several aspects are worth mentioning. In particular, Pervez et al, proposed a danger index to estimate user’s safety during mobility assistance [ 50 ]. Even though this study does not calculate such indicators, it avoids most of the unsafe situations highlighted in Pervez et al, On the one hand, it is pointed out that for safe assistance there should not be any appreciable speed mismatch between the assistive robot and the user.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of safety provision during each of the assistance levels, several aspects are worth mentioning. In particular, Pervez et al, proposed a danger index to estimate user’s safety during mobility assistance [ 50 ]. Even though this study does not calculate such indicators, it avoids most of the unsafe situations highlighted in Pervez et al, On the one hand, it is pointed out that for safe assistance there should not be any appreciable speed mismatch between the assistive robot and the user.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed Concept Mobility System is a robotic system with sensing and actuation systems that adopts a human centric robotics approach [ 21 , 22 ] to achieve the following physical attributes and functions:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pHMI-based technologies should consider additional uncertainties which can result from dissimilar behavioral attitudes due to psychological, sociological, or cultural differences or involve different physical-physiological characteristics [14]. A well-posed pHMI-based technology should adjust to or dampen out these uncertainties, assuring safe operational conditions [13, 15], satisfy appropriate efficiency, and avoid possible execution and evaluation errors, providing accurate and intuitive feedback responses [16]. The real-time control and monitoring of the contact forces are one of the main design specifications for pHMI applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%