2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe CO2 threshold limits for indoor long-range airborne transmission control of COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the CO 2 concentration was classified as high or low based on a cut-off of 1,000 ppm; however, for future social implementation, a method to adaptively calculate the excess CO 2 threshold based on the number of occupants, community prevalence, and activity level should be adopted [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the CO 2 concentration was classified as high or low based on a cut-off of 1,000 ppm; however, for future social implementation, a method to adaptively calculate the excess CO 2 threshold based on the number of occupants, community prevalence, and activity level should be adopted [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to this, it is recommended for many spaces that the supply of outside (fresh) air be a minimum of 10 L/s per person, which is generally enough to ensure a maximum CO 2 concentration of 800-1000 ppm [117]. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, CO 2 concentration has increasingly been used as a surrogate marker of respiratory aerosol concentration inside buildings [114,[118][119][120][121]. Ventilation air introduced from outside dilutes the exhaled CO 2 produced by building occupants, so the CO 2 concentration can be used to determine whether or not a space is adequately ventilated.…”
Section: Droplet Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Moreover, more researchers insist that carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) can reflect the trend of bioaerosol concentration, and strongly recommend that CO 2 concentration be used for infection risk-based monitoring. [35][36][37][38][39] Research has shown that particulate matter pollution is a serious global risk factor to human health among all key pollutants, 40 and PM 2.5 levels are positively correlated with COVID-19 exposure risk, 25 as fine particles (FPs) and ultrafine particles (UFPs) have small particle sizes and large specific surface areas, making them easy to adsorb metals, microorganisms, and other pollutants. 40 Particles may play a role in the differential distribution and propagation rate of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%