2005
DOI: 10.7748/mhp2005.05.8.8.13.c1859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe and supportive observation in practice: a clinical governance project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such practices have been found elsewhere to have significant positive effects on patient satisfaction (Reynolds et al, 2005), suggesting that both staff and patients find these practices favourable. However, with the authority to adjust observation levels comes accountability and some nurses may not feel comfortable with this level of responsibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such practices have been found elsewhere to have significant positive effects on patient satisfaction (Reynolds et al, 2005), suggesting that both staff and patients find these practices favourable. However, with the authority to adjust observation levels comes accountability and some nurses may not feel comfortable with this level of responsibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Disturbingly, Whittington & McLaughlin (2000) found that 80% of the time nurses spend 'doing' constant observations can be classed as 'noninteractional'. Reynolds et al (2005) described the implementation of an observation policy which involved working collaboratively with patients regarding their risk assessments and level of observation. This policy gave nurses the authority to adjust observation levels and stated that they should be reviewed on a daily basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It did not make a difference whether qualified nurses were regular or bank staff, as both of these variables were negatively correlated with constant SO. Previous research has found SO to be regarded as an unpleasant and low status activity that can be delegated to junior or untrained staff (Reynolds, O'Shaughnessy, Walker, & Pereiram, 2005), sometimes against official hospital policy (Gournay & Bowers, 2000). SO use is only likely for patients posing the highest risk to themselves or others, yet this practice contrasts sharply with the delegation of intensive psychiatric nursing care to those least well trained to conduct it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Reynolds et al . ; Vrale & Steen ). However, the evidence base also highlights that nurses might struggle to fully realize such engagement (James et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%