2022
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2020.3024950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe and Efficient Cooperative Platooning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is still interesting to analyse the optimal controller configuration for the case that communication is lost. For specialised platooning solutions based on model predictive or sliding mode control that are robust against communication loss or that do not use communication at all, the reader is referred to [24,36]. For all three information flow topologies the same optimisation including all other uncertainties as discussed in Section 2.4 is conducted in MATLAB®/Simulink.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is still interesting to analyse the optimal controller configuration for the case that communication is lost. For specialised platooning solutions based on model predictive or sliding mode control that are robust against communication loss or that do not use communication at all, the reader is referred to [24,36]. For all three information flow topologies the same optimisation including all other uncertainties as discussed in Section 2.4 is conducted in MATLAB®/Simulink.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, a simple constant time-gap policy is applied as in [14,20,22,23], but the time-gap itself is an exogenous, user-defined parameter, even though the spacing policy evidently exerts great influence on energy consumption and safety. An alternative MPC-based approach is given in [24], where the spacing between the platoon members is not explicitly defined, but emerges from the optimisation of the cost function itself. Nonetheless, for most existing controllers, it is an open question how to choose the constant time headway in a sensible way that enables high energy savings while also guaranteeing safe operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many researchers are attracted by the potentials of cooperative control of connected platooning vehicles. They are engaged in developing innovative design paradigms to address the platoon control-related challenge from the perspective of control theory, such as H-infinity synthesis-based robust control [3], [4], car-following model and consensus-based control [5]- [7], vehicular sensor-based and Doppler-compensationbased control [10], and model predictive control (MPC)-based methods [8], [9]. Nevertheless, among these platoon controlrelated works, few have targeted the joint optimization of communication and computation resources.…”
Section: B Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracking performance for a range of string stable controllers can be found in the references therein. Various recent MPC-based approaches have been suggested for improved safety in [16], [17]. In [18], a string stable controller is designed that is safe under communication delays.…”
Section: A Related Work On Platooningmentioning
confidence: 99%