2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00849-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAFARI: shape analysis for AI-segmented images

Abstract: Background Recent developments to segment and characterize the regions of interest (ROI) within medical images have led to promising shape analysis studies. However, the procedures to analyze the ROI are arbitrary and vary by study. A tool to translate the ROI to analyzable shape representations and features is greatly needed. Results We developed SAFARI (shape analysis for AI-segmented images), an open-source package with a user-friendly online t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of features measuring shape deformations, irregularities, and extremes in medical data analysis is well-documented in various studies, which emphasize their importance over average values for predictive modeling and diagnosis [55][56][57][58][59]. For example, it is found that malignant lesions have rough, irregular surface contours while benign lesions have smooth, regular surfaces, and asymmetry is more common in malignant than benign breast lesions [56,57].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Feature Selection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of features measuring shape deformations, irregularities, and extremes in medical data analysis is well-documented in various studies, which emphasize their importance over average values for predictive modeling and diagnosis [55][56][57][58][59]. For example, it is found that malignant lesions have rough, irregular surface contours while benign lesions have smooth, regular surfaces, and asymmetry is more common in malignant than benign breast lesions [56,57].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Feature Selection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%