2022
DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2022.2044597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saddle versus non-saddle pulmonary embolism: differences in the clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome characteristics

Abstract: The central location, the size, and instability of saddle pulmonary embolism (PE) have raised considerable concerns regarding its hemodynamic consequences and the optimal management approach. Sparse and conflicting reports have addressed these concerns in the past. We aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation, hemodynamic and echocardiographic effects, as well as the outcomes of saddle PE, and compare the results with those of non-saddle type. This was a retrospective study of 432 adult patients with saddle … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous studies suggest that SPE accounts for up to 5 % of all PE cases [9], recent reports suggest a figure as high as 17 % among all PE cases [10]. The central location, the large size, and the unstable nature (with the risk of migration and lodging into the main pulmonary arteries or their branches) of SPE have raised considerable concerns regarding the hemodynamic consequences and the optimal treatment for such clots [10,11]. Before the era of computerized tomography (CT) scan techniques, SPE was regarded by many authors as a grave diagnosis because most of the cases were diagnosed at necropsy [9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although previous studies suggest that SPE accounts for up to 5 % of all PE cases [9], recent reports suggest a figure as high as 17 % among all PE cases [10]. The central location, the large size, and the unstable nature (with the risk of migration and lodging into the main pulmonary arteries or their branches) of SPE have raised considerable concerns regarding the hemodynamic consequences and the optimal treatment for such clots [10,11]. Before the era of computerized tomography (CT) scan techniques, SPE was regarded by many authors as a grave diagnosis because most of the cases were diagnosed at necropsy [9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The exact incidence of SPE is unknown. Although previous studies suggest that SPE accounts for up to 5 % of all PE cases [9], recent reports suggest a figure as high as 17 % among all PE cases [10]. The central location, the large size, and the unstable nature (with the risk of migration and lodging into the main pulmonary arteries or their branches) of SPE have raised considerable concerns regarding the hemodynamic consequences and the optimal treatment for such clots [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Saddle embolus was reported higher in our outcome group compared to our event-free group, but this was not statistically significant, probably because of the lower number of saddle emboli than our lobar emboli and segmental emboli patients. Recent studies show that saddle pulmonary embolism results in a higher proportion of hemodynamic instability and other adverse events ( 26 , 27 ). Despite saddle emboli, lobar artery emboli patients had a higher proportion in our population in both groups, so it worked as a helpful variable for outcome prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central pulmonary embolism is diagnosed when thrombi are found in the main trunk of the pulmonary artery and the right or left pulmonary arteries [ 3 ]. Saddle PE refers to a specific type of central PE-an embolus lodged in the bifurcation of the main pulmonary artery trunk, often extending into the right and left pulmonary arteries [ 4 , 5 ]. Saddle emboli are more commonly (but not always) high-risk (super-massive or massive) or intermediate-risk (sub-massive) [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%