Sacroiliac joint syndrome 10 years after lumbar arthroplasty: the importance of spinopelvic alignment

Ciarpaglini, Riccardo; Otten, Philippe; Sutter, Patrick; Duy, Vo Quoc; Gautier, Emanuel; Maestretti, Gianluca

doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3547-9

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…38 Several authors have examined lumbar sagittal balance as a contributor to post-lumbar fusion SIJ pain suggesting that failure to restore lumbar lordosis (leaving the patient with a residual pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch) is associated with post-lumbar fusion SIJ pain. [39][40][41]…”

Section: Sij Pain Etiology and Epidemiologymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update—Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity

Lorio

Kube²,

Araghi

2020

Int J Spine Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The index 2014 International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy Statement-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion-was generated out of necessity to provide an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)-based background and emphasize tools to ensure correct diagnosis (Appendix Table A1). A timely ICD-10-based 2016 update provided a granular threshold selection with improved level of evidence and a more robust and relevant database. As procedures and treatment options have evolved, this 2020 update reviews and analyzes the expanding evidence base and provides guidance relating to differences between the lateral and dorsal surgical procedures for minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion.

show abstract

Section: Sij Pain Etiology and Epidemiologymentioning

confidence: 99%

International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update—Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity

Lorio

Kube²,

Araghi

2020

Int J Spine Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In one study, David [100] concluded that the "rate of reoperation secondary to adjacent segment disease is ten times lower than the rates reported in the literature for fusion." Furthermore, the rates of secondary sacroiliac joint dysfunction following LDA were low in the mid-term [101]. Studies of modern LDAs have also reported faster patient recovery, higher satisfaction in the short-term compared to the fusion techniques [95].…”

Section: Operative Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lumbar degenerative disc disease is extremely common. Current evidence supports surgery in carefully selected patients who have failed non-operative treatment and do not exhibit any substantial psychosocial overlay. Fusion surgery employing the correct grafting and stabilization techniques has long-term results demonstrating successful clinical outcomes. However, the best approach for fusion remains debatable. There is some evidence supporting the more complex, technically demanding and higher risk interbody fusion techniques for the younger, active patients or patients with a higher risk of non-union. Lumbar disc arthroplasty and hybrid techniques are still relatively novel procedures despite promising short-term and mid-term outcomes. Long-term studies demonstrating superiority over fusion are required before these techniques may be recommended to replace fusion as the gold standard. Novel stem cell approaches combined with tissue engineering therapies continue to be developed in expectation of improving clinical outcomes. Results with appropriate follow-up are not yet available to indicate if such techniques are safe, cost-effective and reliable in the long-term.

show abstract

A systematic review and update on diagnosis and treatment of new onset sacroiliac joint dysfunction after lumbar fusion

Karimi,

Rodrigues,

Patel

et al. 2024

Acta Neurochir

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sacroiliac joint syndrome 10 years after lumbar arthroplasty: the importance of spinopelvic alignment

Abstract: The low rate of SIJD 10 years after lumbar arthroplasty might be explained by the preservation of the spinopelvic balance.

Cited by 5 publications

References 27 publications

International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update—Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity

International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update—Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity

Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

A systematic review and update on diagnosis and treatment of new onset sacroiliac joint dysfunction after lumbar fusion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About