2013
DOI: 10.1037/npe0000014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sacred values: Trade-off type matters.

Abstract: Previous psychological investigations revealed that sacred values (SVs; the belief that certain values are nonsubstitutable and may not be traded off, in particular, against secular economic values) modulates moral decision making depending on the type of SV infringement involved. Extending this research, we compared neurofunctional correlates determined from fMRI measurements during decision making in 3 different trade-off types (taboo, tragic, and routine) with psychological measures obtained from the same 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the IFG could provide input that represents semantic rules, which specifically in high cost situations need to be retrieved in order to incline participants towards honesty irrespective of consequences. In agreement with the proposed role of the IFG, activation in the IFG has been found to be stronger when individuals refuse to accept money for a change in their previously reported moral views compared to when they accept 46 (see also 47 ). Our results reveal that the DLPFC-IFG and the DMPFC-IFG connectivity in individuals with strong honesty-related values is enhanced specifically when high economic costs are involved and thus strong control mechanisms are needed to protect the honesty-related values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, the IFG could provide input that represents semantic rules, which specifically in high cost situations need to be retrieved in order to incline participants towards honesty irrespective of consequences. In agreement with the proposed role of the IFG, activation in the IFG has been found to be stronger when individuals refuse to accept money for a change in their previously reported moral views compared to when they accept 46 (see also 47 ). Our results reveal that the DLPFC-IFG and the DMPFC-IFG connectivity in individuals with strong honesty-related values is enhanced specifically when high economic costs are involved and thus strong control mechanisms are needed to protect the honesty-related values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These values often lead individuals to behave as “devoted actors,” following a rule‐bound logic to do what is right regardless of risks or rewards, rather than a utilitarian logic of costs and benefits (Atran, ; Bennis, Medin, & Bartels, ). FMRI studies also show that sacred values activate regions of the brain that help process deontic rules, including the temporoparietal junction and anterior temporal lobe (Berns et al, ; Duc, Hanselmann, Boesiger, & Tanner, ; Kaplan et al, ). These findings indicate that sacred values are linked to deontological processing, which suggests that morally convicted attitudes are as well, although this connection remains to be tested.…”
Section: Moral Convictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-reported response of anger and moral outrage previously shown to accompany taboo proposals has recently also been shown to correspond to activation in the left anterior temporal lobe and bilateral amygdalae-areas associated with rule-based processing and emotion. This activation also correlated with moral disgust ratings ( Duc et al 2013 ). Importantly, this activation did not occur for tragic or routine SV trade-offs.…”
Section: Sacred Valuesmentioning
confidence: 64%