2012
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2012.688060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sacred Land or National Sacrifice Zone: The Role of Values in the Yucca Mountain Participation Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intergenerational and institutional shifts in ecocultural interests and perspect ives threaten the continuity, sustainability, and regenerativity of agro forestry systems in the Gedeo Zone, and similar shifts are at play in different settings around the world. For example, the different representations of spaces as sacred, home, and ritual by indigenous communities in the US and India, and conversely the designation of the same spaces as nuclear waste zone and tourist centers by federal governments (Endres, 2012;Ormsby, 2013) similarly illustrate ways human regenerative or destructive practices are shaped by ontological orientations (Ingold, 2000). Attending to these overwhelmingly uni-directional global shifts from mutualism to dualism is imperative to all crisis focused disciplines as our very continued existence as a species interwoven with others of this planet depends on retaining and regenerating restorative ways of being, relating, and dwelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intergenerational and institutional shifts in ecocultural interests and perspect ives threaten the continuity, sustainability, and regenerativity of agro forestry systems in the Gedeo Zone, and similar shifts are at play in different settings around the world. For example, the different representations of spaces as sacred, home, and ritual by indigenous communities in the US and India, and conversely the designation of the same spaces as nuclear waste zone and tourist centers by federal governments (Endres, 2012;Ormsby, 2013) similarly illustrate ways human regenerative or destructive practices are shaped by ontological orientations (Ingold, 2000). Attending to these overwhelmingly uni-directional global shifts from mutualism to dualism is imperative to all crisis focused disciplines as our very continued existence as a species interwoven with others of this planet depends on retaining and regenerating restorative ways of being, relating, and dwelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, competing ontological discourses in the US frame Yucca Mountain as sacred space by First Nations people and as national sacrifice zone for a nuclear waste depository by the US federal government (Endres, 2012). Similarly, discourses in India frame forests in East and West Khasi Hills as sacred groves by followers of traditional beliefs and as dwelling spaces of demonic spirits by Christians (Ormsby, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global protest rapidly grew through the Web, with the proliferation of dedicated websites, blogs, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram pages. This controversy between science and sacred land echoes similar cases, like the one illustrated by Endres (2012) regarding the Yucca Mountain and the incommensurability of values between American Indians and the federal government.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Nuclear issues function at the crossroads of environmentalism and energy production. This should force decision makers to grapple with the technical consequences of adoption, emotional appeals of risk, and the abstract cultural values necessary to reach consensus for moving forward (Blue Ribbon Commission, 2012;Endres, 2012). Understanding how communities want control in both process and outcomes becomes necessary if policymakers hope to transcend the common outcome of a policy decision followed by a litigious response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy making in the domain of nuclear power and waste storage has tended toward technical and expert decisions, sometimes leading to strong public backlash (Blue Ribbon Commission, 2012) and the marginalization of affected communities like Native American tribes (Endres, 2009b(Endres, , 2012. Nuclear communication scholarship has examined the many deliberative shortcomings of decision-making processes on nuclear facility siting, which often feature limited opportunities for public involvement and deep divisions between citizens and policymakers (Hamilton, 2007;Kinsella et al, 2015).…”
Section: Public Deliberation On Policy Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%