Sacred Excess: Organizational Ignorance in an Age of Toxic Data

Abstract

Actors in data-intensive industries at times deliberately induce and reproduce organizational ignorance by engaging in over-production of data. This observation leads the paper to make two claims. First, members of these industries fetishize data excess not in order to reduce, but in order to reproduce and stabilize organizational ignorance. Second, in this process of fetishization, organizational ignorance gives rise to forms of collective effervescence similar to that found in totemistic religions. This effervescence allows organizational actors to draw defining lines around that which is marked as awe-inspiring, dangerous and off-limits, namely the sacred. In reviewing organizational ignorance from the perspective of the sacred, this paper proposes that, paradoxically, contemporary forms of data creation allow companies and industries to organize themselves around ignorance as opposed to the promise of knowledge and insight. The paper uses this theoretical proposal in order to outline the contours of an alternative ontology of organizational ignorance, one that understands this phenomenon in terms of excessive presence of data and information.

Connectivity in and around Organizations: Waves, tensions and trade-offs

“…Second, as we increasingly use machines to connect us to information about all aspects of life, we reduce our reliance on and connections with non-machine data, such as subtle social cues from those around us, the natural world and our own embodied self. Schwarzkopf (2019) warns that an overreliance on data can create cultures of sacred and non-contestable ‘truths’ that foster ignorance rather than the open-minded, creative cultures that we seek to support in a digital world. A passive response to understanding and managing digital analytics places us at risk of being hyper-connected to technology, while losing the connection with our own humanity.…”

Burning wet wood: varieties of non-recognition in energy transitions

“…Information and communication technology can both forestall unintentional inattention by automatically suggesting relevant information and lead to inattention by creating echo chambers that filter out information received by the individual (Jasny et al 2018). As noted by Schwarzkopf (2018) from the perspective of organisational ignorance, unintentional inattention can emerge because of an overflow of too much data. Unintentional inattention can also refer to a process in which existing information becomes erased from the memory of an individual or institution.…”

Urban development project goals and the role of professional ignorance: ambiguous policy objectives and their consequences

“…a household buying a residential home) has a detailed understanding of how creditworthiness is calculated, and yet both act on basis of such numerical information. In such situations, what is referred to as professional ignorance (Abbott, 2010), the ability to actively overlook what is in fact not known to be able to proceed, is a professional skill that guides the actor's work (Jeon, 2020; Schwarzkopf, 2020; Schaefer, 2019; Bakken and Wiik, 2018; Davies and McGoey, 2012).…”