“…Seventy‐two full‐text articles were assessed in detail and a further 11 studies were excluded: one study used mixed urinary and faecal incontinence indications for implantation, one study did not have original clinical outcome data, two studies had PNE data only, three studies had no documented baseline of the chosen outcome measures, two studies had no follow‐up terms documented, one study did not clearly document the results of the chosen outcome measures and one study was excluded as it exactly duplicated the data set of another included study; further clarification was not possible. This left 61 SNS studies that were appropriate for inclusion; in order to present data on ITT analysis, studies were separated into those that included all consecutive patients (including failures) in whom PNE was attempted (46 studies) ( Table ) and those that only reported outcomes of positively responding patients to the test phase (15 studies) ( Table ). Patients who were still awaiting permanent implantation despite a successful PNE were excluded from the analysis.…”