2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2005.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria as potential mycotoxin decontaminating agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
263
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
11
263
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Biopreservation allows prolonged shelf life and enhanced safety of foods through natural or supplementary microflora and their antimicrobial products (34). Among the different potential decontaminating microorganisms, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) represent unique groups, which are widely used in food fermentation and preservation (35). Many LAB strains as well as some S. cerevisiae var.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biopreservation allows prolonged shelf life and enhanced safety of foods through natural or supplementary microflora and their antimicrobial products (34). Among the different potential decontaminating microorganisms, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) represent unique groups, which are widely used in food fermentation and preservation (35). Many LAB strains as well as some S. cerevisiae var.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cecchini et al 4 demonstrated that the percentage of OTA removal during fermentation was between 46.83% and 52.16% in white wine and between 53.21% and 70.13% in red wine, depending on the yeast strain used. In another study conducted by Shetty and Jespersen 18 , most of the yeast strains (10 8 cells) bound more than 15% of AFB 1 within 72 h and the toxin binding was highly strain specific. Similarly, Caridi et al 2 have reported that the removal of OTA in wines by 20 different Saccharo-myces sensu stricto strains, using a naturally and spiked OTA-containing grape must (1.58 and 7.63 ng/mL, respectively), after 90 days of fermentation were between 39.9-92.1% and between 67.9-83.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…S. boulardii SB20 in this study had maximum lactic acid and ethanol concentrations of 20.23 and 194 mmol L −1 respectively during the fermentation of sterile ground maize slurry. However, the review by Shetty and Jespersen (2006) indicated that the antagonistic property of S. cerevisiae was mostly due to the polysaccharide part of the cell wall that is involved in surface binding of pathogenic toxins. C. tropicalis (NGY1) in this fermentation experiment did not produce a significant amount of ethanol, neither was there a significant decrease in pH for antimicrobial activity.…”
Section: Microbial Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important that the selected microbial inoculant to facilitate the process should be adaptive to the substrate from the onset of fermentation so as to prevent the growth of unwanted microorganisms to a level that would impair the product's quality. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeast occur as part of the natural microbial population in spontaneously fermented foods and as starter cultures in the food and beverage industry (Shetty & Jespersen, 2006). In a recent study by ObinnaEchem, Kuri, and Beal (2014), the LAB population of a selected Nigerian traditional fermented maize food called akamu was found to be dominated by strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. fermentum, L. delbrueckii subsp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%