2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saccadic eye movements are deployed faster for salient facial stimuli, but are relatively indifferent to their emotional content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Experiment 5 (Fig. 5E), our observation of no influence of instructed facial affect on the EVR resonate with recent studies questioning the “threat bias” theory (Bannerman et al, 2009, 2010; Hansen & Hansen, 1988; Niedenthal, 1990), finding that methodological controls eliminate saccadic preferences towards angry faces (Coelho et al, 2010; Thierry et al, 2007; Webb et al, 2022). This indicates that the mechanism underlying the EVR can distinguish between evolutionary relevant objects (faces) and abstract objects (scrambled images), but cannot distinguish between abstract objects nor faces of different affect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Experiment 5 (Fig. 5E), our observation of no influence of instructed facial affect on the EVR resonate with recent studies questioning the “threat bias” theory (Bannerman et al, 2009, 2010; Hansen & Hansen, 1988; Niedenthal, 1990), finding that methodological controls eliminate saccadic preferences towards angry faces (Coelho et al, 2010; Thierry et al, 2007; Webb et al, 2022). This indicates that the mechanism underlying the EVR can distinguish between evolutionary relevant objects (faces) and abstract objects (scrambled images), but cannot distinguish between abstract objects nor faces of different affect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In Experiment 1, we observed a similar but smaller effect on EVR expression only when the face was on the left and the scrambled image was on the right. The results in Experiments 1 and 2 are consistent with studies showing that low-spatial frequency, high-contrast, and more salient stimuli evoke larger magnitude EVRs, more express saccades, and stronger visual responses in the movement-related layers of the SC (Chen et al, 2018; Marino et al, 2012; Meeter & Van der Stigchel, 2013; Webb et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This suggests that subjective pleasantness and arousal levels do not influence average saccadic distances. While this finding contrasts with studies demonstrating saccadic amplitudes in response to emotional faces [19,39,40], it contributes to the consistency in the literature that suggests facial affective pleasure does not impact saccadic eye movements [34,35].…”
Section: Influence Of Emotions On Saccadic Distances In Facial Stimulicontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Instead, perceptual salience factors of faces are more likely to influence eye movement speed. The viewpoint is supported by research carried out by a few previous studies [34,35]. Therefore, the relationship between emotional pleasure or arousal and eye movement indicators may be more complex, and further research is needed to elucidate the precise connection between the subjective emotional perception of different facial stimuli and eye movement behavior.…”
Section: The Impact Of Pleasure and Arousal On Eye Movementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation