2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sacbe: A building block approach for constructing efficient and flexible end-to-end cloud storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantages of our proposal with respect to the related work are: i) It allows the creation of policies for providing cloud storage solution with data availability that improves storage utilization and performance of the information sharing for CDS services based on virtual machines and containers; ii) Most of the related work have been tested in simulated scenarios, while our methodology was tested in a prototype of a semantic CDS service for an organizational scenario; iii) To the best of our knowledge, this work would be the first approach that provides an integrated load balancing, availability and reliability scheme based on the classification of users and content (topics) activity, which dynamically adapt the replication factor and distribution of contents in a semantic CDS service to improve the trade-off between I/O performance and cloud storage consumption; and iv) A complementary simulator and emulator based on our methodology is available to evaluate state-of-the-art availability policies and load balancing methods at different scales. Some aspects that were not considered in our proposal and are available in the related work are: i) The use of synchronization techniques on the end-user side that can potentially improve user experience [32], [34]; and ii) The use of Erasure Coding (EC) techniques to provide data confidentiality and improve storage consumption [19], [20], [35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main advantages of our proposal with respect to the related work are: i) It allows the creation of policies for providing cloud storage solution with data availability that improves storage utilization and performance of the information sharing for CDS services based on virtual machines and containers; ii) Most of the related work have been tested in simulated scenarios, while our methodology was tested in a prototype of a semantic CDS service for an organizational scenario; iii) To the best of our knowledge, this work would be the first approach that provides an integrated load balancing, availability and reliability scheme based on the classification of users and content (topics) activity, which dynamically adapt the replication factor and distribution of contents in a semantic CDS service to improve the trade-off between I/O performance and cloud storage consumption; and iv) A complementary simulator and emulator based on our methodology is available to evaluate state-of-the-art availability policies and load balancing methods at different scales. Some aspects that were not considered in our proposal and are available in the related work are: i) The use of synchronization techniques on the end-user side that can potentially improve user experience [32], [34]; and ii) The use of Erasure Coding (EC) techniques to provide data confidentiality and improve storage consumption [19], [20], [35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a proof of concept, we deployed a Semantic Content Delivery and Sharing (S-CDS) service, an evolution of a content distribution and file sharing platform named SkyCDS [4], [35], which was implemented on a private cloud. We added our model to the Pub/Sub system of SkyCDS to classify users and content topics.…”
Section: Integration Of the Classification Model In A Semantic Cds Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10] [11] [12], there is a set of solutions for building efficient and flexible end-to-end cloud storage. Information integrity is preserved based on the IDA implementation embedded in parallel processing patterns.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3,2) C 19 :(8,5) C 37 :(11,2) C 55 :(12,11) C 73 :(14,8) C 2 :(4,2) C 20 :(8,6) C 38 :(11,3) C 56 :(13,2) C 74 :(14,9) C 3 :(4,3)C21 :(8,7) C 39 :(11,4) C 57 :(13,3) C 75 :(14,10) C 4 :(5,2) C 22 :(9,2) C 40 :(11,5) C 58 :(13,4) C 76 :(14,11) C 5 :(5,3) C 23 :(9,3) C 41 :(11,6) C 59 :(13,5) C 77 :(14,12) C 6 :(5,4) C 24 :(9,4) C 42 :(11,7) C 60 :(13,6) C 78 :(14,13) C 7 :(6,2) C 25 :(9,5) C 43 :(11,8) C 61 :(13,7) C 79 :(15,2) C 8 :(6,3) C 26 :(9,6) C 44 :(11,9) C 62 :(13,8) C 80 :(15,3) C 9 :(6,4) C 27 :(9,7) C 45 :(11,10) C 63 :(13,9) C 81 :(15,4) C 10 :(6,5) C 28 :(9,8) C 46 :(12,2) C 64 :(13,10) C 82 :(15,5) C 11 :(7,2) C 29 :(10,2) C 47 :(12,3) C 65 :(13,11) C 83 :(15,6) C 12 :(7,3) C 30 :(10,3) C 48 :(12,4) C 66 :(13,12) C 84 :(15,7) C 13 :(7,4) C 31 :(10,4) C 49 :(12,5) C 67 :(14,2) C 85 :(15,8) C 14 :(7,5) C 32 :(10,5) C 50 :(12,6) C 68 :(14,3) C 86 :(15,9) C 15 :(7,6) C 33 :(10,6) C 51 :(12,7) C 69 :(14,4) C 87 :(15,10) C 16 :(8,2) C 34 :(10,7) C 52 :(12,8) C 70 :(14,5) C 88 :(15,11) C 17 :(8,3) C 35 :(10,8) C 53 :(12,9) C 71 :(14,6) C 89 :(15,12) C 18 :(8,4) C 36 :(10,9) C 54 :(12,10) C 72 :(14,7) C 90 :(15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scheme, each container also includes its dependencies and even a reduced operating system to ensure a regular operation over different types of platforms; as a result, the geoportal can be replicated to build clusters to improve the experience of end-users [8]. Moreover, the service container can be reused to change the geoportal by another application (e.g.…”
Section: An Interoperable Cloud-based Geoportal: Design Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%