2018
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(18)33777-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sa1510 - Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, patients may not be considered for LT because of any characteristic and ablation has limited efficacy for large HCC. Therefore, this may induce consideration for the potential benefit of laparoscopic resection if HCC is in proper locations and there is a minor degree of CSPH [27,48,[59][60][61][62][63].…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, patients may not be considered for LT because of any characteristic and ablation has limited efficacy for large HCC. Therefore, this may induce consideration for the potential benefit of laparoscopic resection if HCC is in proper locations and there is a minor degree of CSPH [27,48,[59][60][61][62][63].…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laparoscopic/robotic resection allows adequate margins and has a reduced invasiveness with lower postoperative complications and potential non-significant impact in liver function even if there exists CSPH [59][60][61][62][63]101]. These encouraging results may induce a resection recommendation in patients who would be initially selected for ablation, but in whom the peripheral tumour location may contraindicate such approach because of risk of tract seeding if punctured without a protective rim of non-tumoral liver or risk of neighbouring organ damage [60].…”
Section: Bclc-a Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%