2016
DOI: 10.1038/ni.3433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S6K-STING interaction regulates cytosolic DNA–mediated activation of the transcription factor IRF3

Abstract: Cytosolic DNA-mediated activation of the transcription factor IRF3 is a key event in host antiviral responses. Here, we show that infection of DNA viruses induced the interaction of the mTOR downstream effector S6K1 (S6 kinase 1) and the signaling adaptor STING in a cGAS (cGAMP synthase)-dependent manner. We further demonstrate that the kinase domain, but not the kinase function of S6K1, was required for the S6K1-STING interaction and that the TBK1 critically promotes this process. The formation of a tripartit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(113 reference statements)
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, TBK1 adaptors Nap1 ( AZI2 ), Sintbad ( TBKBP1 ), or TANK all displayed dissimilar subcellular localization in a study of TBK1 network engagement (51). While our work, and related observations, suggest the TBK1/S6K regulatory relationship can support survival of some cancer cell types, these observations may also have important mechanistic implications for S6K-dependent innate immune signaling within the STING-TBK1 pathway (48). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, TBK1 adaptors Nap1 ( AZI2 ), Sintbad ( TBKBP1 ), or TANK all displayed dissimilar subcellular localization in a study of TBK1 network engagement (51). While our work, and related observations, suggest the TBK1/S6K regulatory relationship can support survival of some cancer cell types, these observations may also have important mechanistic implications for S6K-dependent innate immune signaling within the STING-TBK1 pathway (48). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…For example, TBK1 is recruited by TRAF-mediated ubiquitination of MAVS or TRIF to mediate innate immune responses to viral RNA-sensing by RIG-1 or bacterial LPS-sensing by TLR4, respectively (44). Furthermore TBK1 is directly engaged in response to cytosolic DNA-sensing by its association with S6K/STING complexes downstream of cGAS (44,48). Within these stimuli-specific complexes, TBK1 phosphorylates adaptor proteins to recruit IRF3 for subsequent phosphorylation by TBK1, allowing IRF3 homodimerization and translocation to the nucleus to induce type I interferons (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These molecular findings establish a plausible mechanism by which chronic STING activation and trafficking not only recruit TBK1 for IRF3 signaling but also bring TBK1 to close proximity with mTORC1 on the lysosomes. Consistent with this finding, mTORC1 substrate S6K was recently shown to be recruited to the STING-TBK1 complex to promote IFN signaling during acute DNA stimulation (23). The molecular details of the interaction between the STING signalsome and the mTORC1 complex, as well as functional consequences during acute and chronic DNA stimulation, require further investigation.…”
Section: Chronic Inflammation Dysregulated Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Immunoprecipitation analysis also did not reveal evidence of ALK binding to other recently identified cytosolic STING-interacting partners such as TIR [Toll/interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor] domain–containing adapter-inducing IFNβ (TRIF) (30) or the ribosomal protein S6 kinase (fig. S5, A to C) (31). These findings suggest that ALK-mediated STING activation may not be dependent on direct binding to known cytosolic regulators of the STING pathway in macrophages and monocytes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%