2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2017.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S-Nitroso-N-acetyl-L-cysteine ethyl ester (SNACET) and N-acetyl-L-cysteine ethyl ester (NACET)–Cysteine-based drug candidates with unique pharmacological profiles for oral use as NO, H2S and GSH suppliers and as antioxidants: Results and overview

Abstract: S-Nitrosothiols or thionitrites with the general formula RSNO are formally composed of the nitrosyl cation (NO+) and a thiolate (RS−), the base of the corresponding acids RSH. The smallest S-nitrosothiol is HSNO and derives from hydrogen sulfide (HSH, H2S). The most common physiological S-nitrosothiols are derived from the amino acid L-cysteine (CysSH). Thus, the simplest S-nitrosothiol is S-nitroso-L-cysteine (CysSNO). CysSNO is a spontaneous potent donor of nitric oxide (NO) which activates soluble guanylyl … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transport of cystine esters into the cell would not itself correct for the loss of sulfhydryl equivalents since cystine is already in the more oxidized disul de state, and D-cystine or D-cysteine would not participate in most of the metabolic pathways of L-cysteine, but uptake of D-cystine esters could potentially drive up levels of intracellular Lcysteine. However, our nding that the highly cell-permeable thiolester reducing agent, N-acetyl-L-cysteine methyl ester, 21 had minimal effects on the ventilatory depressant effects of morphine suggests that Dcystine diEE and D-cystine diME do not act simply by increasing reducing equivalents in cells. Potential mechanisms of action of D-cystine diEE and D-cystine diME may involve (a) interference with opioid receptor-linked β-arrestin cell signaling, which would spare the Gprotein-mediated antinociceptive actions of morphine, 45,46 and/or conversion of these thiolesters to bioactive S-nitrosothiols (i.e., S-nitroso-Dcystine diEE, S-nitroso-D-cystine diME) that may act as intracellular nitrosating agents similar to Snitroso-L-cysteine ethyl ester (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Transport of cystine esters into the cell would not itself correct for the loss of sulfhydryl equivalents since cystine is already in the more oxidized disul de state, and D-cystine or D-cysteine would not participate in most of the metabolic pathways of L-cysteine, but uptake of D-cystine esters could potentially drive up levels of intracellular Lcysteine. However, our nding that the highly cell-permeable thiolester reducing agent, N-acetyl-L-cysteine methyl ester, 21 had minimal effects on the ventilatory depressant effects of morphine suggests that Dcystine diEE and D-cystine diME do not act simply by increasing reducing equivalents in cells. Potential mechanisms of action of D-cystine diEE and D-cystine diME may involve (a) interference with opioid receptor-linked β-arrestin cell signaling, which would spare the Gprotein-mediated antinociceptive actions of morphine, 45,46 and/or conversion of these thiolesters to bioactive S-nitrosothiols (i.e., S-nitroso-Dcystine diEE, S-nitroso-D-cystine diME) that may act as intracellular nitrosating agents similar to Snitroso-L-cysteine ethyl ester (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…2, Supplemental Table 3). In addition, the injection of N-acetyl-L-cysteine methyl ester (L-NACme, 2 x 500 µmol/kg, IV), which is a highly cell penetrable reducing agent, 21 elicited minor effects on morphine (10 mg/kg, IV)-induced changes in Freq, TV and MV (Supplemental Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 3).…”
Section: Ventilatory Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the donors in general have the ability to cause cell death in cancer cells but not in normal cells, it has led to the possibility that the donors may be complementarily effective in cancer treatment. As with all therapeutic interventions of chemical agents, awareness is needed of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodistribution, metabolism, drug delivery, bioavailability, tissue specificity, adverse reactions, donor-drug interactions and the physical and chemical properties of the therapeutic agent which in the case of H 2 S and NO donors are at a very early stage of our knowledge [96].…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%