2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01134.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S‐N‐P curves in 7075 T7351 and 2024 T3 aluminium alloys subjected to surface treatments

Abstract: A B S T R A C T The S-N-P (stress, number of cycles, failure probability) curves for 2024 T3 and 7075 T7351 aluminium alloys were obtained. Previously, surface treatments of degreasing and different types of anodizing were applied to samples, evaluating the influence of these treatments on the fatigue life of the alloys. The determination of the S-N-P curves was done using Maennig's method. Rotary fatigue was used because this technique produces greater stress on the sample surfaces, the zone in which it is im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the difference of fatigue life between PEO coating and PEO with impregnation epoxy resin was to be caused by the difference of fatigue crack initiation life. Moreover, the difference of fatigue life and influence factors (except the surface hardness without discussion) between hard anodized coating and PEO coating on the aluminum alloys had been described in previous literature by Yerokhin et al (1999Yerokhin et al ( , 2004Yerokhin et al ( , 2005, Lonyuk et al (2007), Nykyforchyn et al (1998), Sheasby and Pinner (2001), Rateick et al (1996), Asquith et al (2006), Khan et al (2005), Dieter and Bacon (1988), Monsalv et al (2007), and Rajasekaran, Raman, Krishna, Joshi, and Sundararajan (2008). The synergistic effects of oxide coating and aluminum substrates attracted a wide variety of study by means of choosing different processing parameters in the anodized coating process.…”
Section: Effects Of Surface Modification On the Fatigue Strength Of Amentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, the difference of fatigue life between PEO coating and PEO with impregnation epoxy resin was to be caused by the difference of fatigue crack initiation life. Moreover, the difference of fatigue life and influence factors (except the surface hardness without discussion) between hard anodized coating and PEO coating on the aluminum alloys had been described in previous literature by Yerokhin et al (1999Yerokhin et al ( , 2004Yerokhin et al ( , 2005, Lonyuk et al (2007), Nykyforchyn et al (1998), Sheasby and Pinner (2001), Rateick et al (1996), Asquith et al (2006), Khan et al (2005), Dieter and Bacon (1988), Monsalv et al (2007), and Rajasekaran, Raman, Krishna, Joshi, and Sundararajan (2008). The synergistic effects of oxide coating and aluminum substrates attracted a wide variety of study by means of choosing different processing parameters in the anodized coating process.…”
Section: Effects Of Surface Modification On the Fatigue Strength Of Amentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A typical feature of anodising-induced pre-damage, which is present in all coatings, is the formation of microvoids. These flaws, which are often referred to as "irregularities", form in the early stages of the anodising process when the Alrich matrix around large primary phase particles dissolves [19,21,22]. Irrespective of the substrate material, they have approximately the same size of 2-3 lm in all four coatings.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Substrate and Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular with aluminium alloys, anodic oxidation processes are employed to improve and retain the surface finish [3], but these also have a significantly negative influence on the bulk fatigue properties [4]. The development of thicker, harder ceramic coatings on aluminium such as by plasma-electrolytic oxidation (PEO) has provided improved wear characteristics but the problem of fatigue strength deficit still remains [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%