S-duality and helicity amplitudes

Abstract

We examine interacting Abelian theories at low energies and show that holomorphically normalized photon helicity amplitudes transform into dual amplitudes under SL(2, Z) as modular forms with weights that depend on the number of positive and negative helicity photons and on the number of internal photon lines. Moreover, canonically normalized helicity amplitudes transform by a phase, so that even though the amplitudes are not duality invariant, their squares are duality invariant. We explicitly verify the duality transformation at one loop by comparing the amplitudes in the case of an electron and the dyon that is its SL(2, Z) image, and extend the invariance of squared amplitudes order by order in perturbation theory. We demonstrate that S-duality is a property of all low-energy effective Abelian theories with electric and/or magnetic charges and see how the duality generically breaks down at high energies.

Dark monopoles and SL(2, ℤ) duality

“…As pointed out in ref. [21], this entire renormalization discussion is completely consistent with the exact results of the Seiberg-Witten theory [29]. In the region of the moduli space where the monopole is light, the low-energy electric coupling e(µ) is driven to large values as we run µ down to the monopole mass from higher energy scales.…”

The black hole weak gravity conjecture with multiple charges

“…One might wonder whether this analysis is relevant to the parity-odd operators. Interestingly, [22] has shown how to generalize the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian by integrating out a monopole or dyonic charge. The effective Lagrangian was derived in that paper (and earlier in [23]) to be…”

Scattering amplitudes for monopoles: pairwise little group and pairwise helicity

“…However, recently it was shown by Terning and Verhaaren [8] that an all orders resummation of soft photons can restore both Lorentz and gauge invariance if Dirac charge quantization [9] is satisfied. Hence it is believed that the electric-magnetic S-matrix is both local and Lorentz invariant, but Lagrangian formulations cannot make both properties manifest at the same time, leading, unsurprisingly, to seemingly unending difficulties in calculating scattering amplitudes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”