2019 13th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icspcs47537.2019.9008696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S-band Steerable Yagi Antenna for CubeSats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed design can be considered as a compromised solution offering proper performance, and keeping the size parameters of the project. For example, the proposed antenna achieves circularly polarized gain of 5.5 dBic, when it is compared to the published references introduced in Table 4, one can find that this value is smaller than [17], [18], [22], [24], [25]. However, on the other hand the areas of these antennas are much larger than ours.…”
Section: B Antenna Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed design can be considered as a compromised solution offering proper performance, and keeping the size parameters of the project. For example, the proposed antenna achieves circularly polarized gain of 5.5 dBic, when it is compared to the published references introduced in Table 4, one can find that this value is smaller than [17], [18], [22], [24], [25]. However, on the other hand the areas of these antennas are much larger than ours.…”
Section: B Antenna Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The direction of maximum radiation is observed to be in the broadside direction (ϴ = 0 o ). Table 3 illustrates a comparison between the proposed CubeSat antenna and the other antennas in recent literature [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] related to S-band CubeSat communications. The antenna satisfies the system requirements in Table 1; the size of the antennas and its HPBW lies within the accepted range as listed in Table 1, the F/B approaches 17 dB, more than 5 dBic gain, and LHCP with XPD of 14 dB within the operating band.…”
Section: B Antenna Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison has been included in Table 4, where the advantages of our proposed antenna are highlighted when compared to other state-of-the-art compact designs. Most of these works are based on WLAN and similar applications, however existing Yagi-Uda antennas for CubeSats [26], [27] have also been included in Table 4 to highlight the novelty in our integration approach for small satellites (in that the existing solar cell array of the Unicorn-2 PicoSat spacecraft is exploited) without requiring independent deployable systems for just the antenna. It should also be noted that the proposed three-director design achieves a competitive size when compared with systems of only one or no directors [29]- [32], without sacrificing performance, bandwidth, or involving complex parasitic loading configurations such as parasitic interdigitated strips.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This antenna design with no miniaturization, needed a substrate of 90 × 150 mm 2 which could be too large for any PicoSat with additional payloads. This led to a modified version in [27] which copper rods embedded in a FR-4 substrate formed a Yagi-Uda array that was mechanically steered to control the beam in the elevation plane. This might increase the complexity and cost, whilst needing the satellite to have the solar panels facing the Earth to achieve full end-fire radiation.…”
Section: Folded Picosat Unicorn2mentioning
confidence: 99%