2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.12.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine anti-cancer agent, enhanced radiosensitivity in a human oral cancer cell line in vivo and in vitro: involvement possibility of inhibition of survival signal, Akt/PKB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reports have suggested that chemoradiotherapy using S-1 in combination with X-ray irradiation is fairly effective against various types of cancer xenografts, and its anticancer effects are mediated by mechanisms including induction of apoptosis, inhibition of survival signals or suppression of radiation-induced hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) activation (22)(23)(24)(25). Preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated the potential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and radiation in treating locally advanced head and neck and pancreatic cancers (26,27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have suggested that chemoradiotherapy using S-1 in combination with X-ray irradiation is fairly effective against various types of cancer xenografts, and its anticancer effects are mediated by mechanisms including induction of apoptosis, inhibition of survival signals or suppression of radiation-induced hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) activation (22)(23)(24)(25). Preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated the potential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and radiation in treating locally advanced head and neck and pancreatic cancers (26,27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the effect on primary foci, the CR rate was 37.5%, indicating a high rate of local tumor control. Additive effects of S-1 on tumor cell killing by irradiation were also confirmed by in vitro study (15)(16)(17). Of the 11 patients in whom cancer was not cured, 2 refused additional treatment, 8 underwent salvage surgery, and selective arterial infusion therapy was possible in the remaining Table II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU can be replaced by long-term daily oral administration of S-1. As S-1 is administered orally, it is convenient for divided radiotherapy [10]. Further, a significant safety advantage was observed in the S-1 plus cisplatin regimen as compared to the 5-FU plus cisplatin regimen in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma studies [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with 5-FU, the response rate (RR) in gastric cancer for S-1 was higher, while the incidence of toxicity was lower as compared with 5-FU [9]. Additionally, S-1 enhances radiotherapy and might prove to be an effective chemotherapeutic agent in a CRT setting [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%