1991
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/3/17/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S=1/2 magnetic chains as domain wall systems

Abstract: The authors describe S=1/2 Ising-like magnetic chains completely in terms of domain walls. They formulate domain wall creation and annihilation operators as fermion operators and calculate the domain wall content of the ground state and of excited states. From exact results for finite chains and from the solution in the one-domain wall subspace they find that a single domain wall behaves like a free particle in a well. The transition between the two equivalent ground states of Ising-like S=1/2 chains is found … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the time evolution of the high-energy state |ini for J z > 1 is identical to that for J ′ z = −J z < −1, where |ini is a low-energy state. At the quantum phase transition from the ferromagnetic state to the critical phase at J ′ z = −1 the ground state, a kink state for J ′ z < −1 (if we impose the boundary condition spin up on the left boundary and spin down on the right boundary) 13 , changes drastically to a state with no kink and power-law correlations for J ′ z > −1. Therefore, our initial state is very close to an eigenstate -the ground state -for J ′ z < −1, but not for J ′ z > −1.…”
Section: Long-time Properties Of the Time-evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the time evolution of the high-energy state |ini for J z > 1 is identical to that for J ′ z = −J z < −1, where |ini is a low-energy state. At the quantum phase transition from the ferromagnetic state to the critical phase at J ′ z = −1 the ground state, a kink state for J ′ z < −1 (if we impose the boundary condition spin up on the left boundary and spin down on the right boundary) 13 , changes drastically to a state with no kink and power-law correlations for J ′ z > −1. Therefore, our initial state is very close to an eigenstate -the ground state -for J ′ z < −1, but not for J ′ z > −1.…”
Section: Long-time Properties Of the Time-evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and therefore decays as n −n , provided the argument α remains fixed at some finite value. If N ≫ 1, and assuming α is indeed fixed, then the correction terms in (13) can be neglected so long as the center of the eigenstate wavepacket is not near the boundaries of the chain.…”
Section: Quantum Solution (Exact)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of an external field and at low temperatures real ferromagnets usually exhibit domain wall structures. But it is commonly believed that pinning effects due to impurities and defects are crucial to stabilize domain walls against quantum fluctuations [3,4,5,6,7]. In other words, in models of quantum ferromagnetism that do not incorporate impurities or defects, one should not expect to find stable domain walls because they are destroyed by quantum fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%