Food Biochemistry and Food Processing 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118308035.ch34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rye Constituents and Their Impact on Rye Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APV ranged from 260 AU (RF9) to 480 AU (RF3), while FT ranged from 68.0 °C (RF5) to 83.0 °C (RF8). Rye flour shows optimal bread making quality with an APV in the range of 400–600 AU and with an FT in the range of 65 to 69 °C [29]. In the present study, only three rye flour samples, namely RF3 (480 AU), RF4 (450 AU), and RF8 (430 AU), were characterized by the optimal value of APV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…APV ranged from 260 AU (RF9) to 480 AU (RF3), while FT ranged from 68.0 °C (RF5) to 83.0 °C (RF8). Rye flour shows optimal bread making quality with an APV in the range of 400–600 AU and with an FT in the range of 65 to 69 °C [29]. In the present study, only three rye flour samples, namely RF3 (480 AU), RF4 (450 AU), and RF8 (430 AU), were characterized by the optimal value of APV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the present study, only two tested flour samples (RF5 and RF6) were characterized by FNs below 200 s, while the remaining tested rye flour samples showed low α-amylase activity (FN values were above 200 s). That probably means that the dough from those rye flour samples were rigid and firm, and the obtained bread should be characterized by low volume, and a dry, dense, and hard crumb [4,29]. The tested rye flour samples differed significantly according to amylograph properties such as APV and FT (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, rye (Meeus et al., 2019) and oat (Hüttner et al., 2010) prolamins and glutelins lack the ability to form a strong viscoelastic protein network that wheat gluten proteins form. As a consequence, hydrating and mixing rye flour results in poorly extensible dough (Verwimp et al., 2006; Weipert, 1997), whereas hydrating and mixing oat flour creates a cake‐like batter (Hüttner et al., 2010; Renzetti et al., 2010). Hence, the protein network in rye doughs and oat batters provides gas cells with less structural support during mixing, fermentation, and early baking than is the case in wheat dough.…”
Section: Gas Incorporation and Gas Cell (De)stabilization During Brea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interchain disulfide bond between the gluten polypeptide and the secondary bond is more likely to be broken. The ability to recombine to form the gluten network and the strength of the gluten skeleton were weakened, resulting in shortened dough stability time, increased degree of softening of the blends, and decreased four quality coefficients (Verwimp, Courtin, Delcour, & Hui, 2006).…”
Section: Proximate Composition From Two Floursmentioning
confidence: 99%