“…Firstly, these seminal works have influenced the entire corpus of subsequent historiography, perpetuating the myth of a pre-colonial idyll that occludes 19 th century upheaval and violence: during which social and ethnic divisions began to crystallise [as] Rwabugiri's administration not only rigidified social distinctions in ethnic terms, but also engendered a process of ethnic self-consciousness among groups of Tutsi in Nduga, central Rwanda. (Pottier 2002:112, see Taylor 2011:1072, Botte 1985 These divisions and growing social conflict are reflected in some of the earliest accounts of German travellers and settlers of the 1890s and early 1900s (see, for example, Kandt 2010) in typically synchronic snapshots of circumstances on the ground (see, for example, Mecklenburg andHerzog1909:44 -85, Von Bethe 1989). Several founding works of the post-colonial period (see, for example, Vansina 1962, Rwabukumba and Mudandagizi 1974, C Newbury 1988 instead present diachronic analyses of the pre-colonial transformation of the kingdom and continuities with the colonial state.…”