The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2024
DOI: 10.1039/d3ta05630a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium single atoms implanted on NiS2-FeS2 nanosheet heterostructures for efficacious water electrolysis

Ram Babu Ghising,
Uday Narayan Pan,
Mani Ram Kandel
et al.

Abstract: Ruthenium single atoms implanted on NiS2-FeS2 nanosheet heterostructures for efficacious water electrolysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, an ultralow overpotential of 10 mV is required to reach a current density of 10 mA cm –2 for FeCoP/NF, which is better than FeP/NF (35 mV), CoP/NF (97 mV), commercial Pt/C catalyst supported on Ni foam, pure Ni foam, and many other recently reported (non)­noble metal-based HER electrocatalysts (Figure g and Table S1). Besides, FeCoP/NF can deliver 100, 200, and 500 mA cm –2 at overpotentials of 57, 86, and 119 mV, respectively (Figure S10), which is better than FeP/NF (204, 305, and 467 mV) and CoP/NF (182, 227, and 331 mV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, an ultralow overpotential of 10 mV is required to reach a current density of 10 mA cm –2 for FeCoP/NF, which is better than FeP/NF (35 mV), CoP/NF (97 mV), commercial Pt/C catalyst supported on Ni foam, pure Ni foam, and many other recently reported (non)­noble metal-based HER electrocatalysts (Figure g and Table S1). Besides, FeCoP/NF can deliver 100, 200, and 500 mA cm –2 at overpotentials of 57, 86, and 119 mV, respectively (Figure S10), which is better than FeP/NF (204, 305, and 467 mV) and CoP/NF (182, 227, and 331 mV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1−4 Among them, the OER is an anodic reaction of hydrogen production by water splitting. 5,6 Compared to the two-electron reaction of a simple hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) system, OER requires more energy to overcome the slow kinetics of the four-electron reaction. 7−10 Therefore, the OER is a rate-controlled reaction of overall water splitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen production from water splitting can achieve high purity, sustainable hydrogen production and zero carbon emissions and is considered to be one of the most promising hydrogen production technologies. Among them, the OER is an anodic reaction of hydrogen production by water splitting. , Compared to the two-electron reaction of a simple hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) system, OER requires more energy to overcome the slow kinetics of the four-electron reaction. Therefore, the OER is a rate-controlled reaction of overall water splitting. In general, expensive and scarce noble metals (such as RuO 2 ) are still considered to be the best electrocatalysts for OER. , Therefore, the development of low-cost, high-activity, and stable catalysts is essential to promoting the efficiency of water splitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%