2008
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.200800495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium‐Indenylidene Complexes: Scope in Cross‐Metathesis Transformations

Abstract: A comparative study examining the catalytic activity of a series of five indenylidene-containing ruthenium complexes in olefin cross-metathesis reactions is presented. Results reveal the greater efficiency of precatalyst 5, highlighting the key role of the N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene (IPr) ligand for this transformation. The scope of this precatalyst was investigated and several microwave experiments were carried out allowing for catalyst loadings as low as 0.1 mol%. Overall, crossmetathe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reveal that the most efficient catalytic systems are based on relatively high loading of Grubbs-Hoveyda-Blechert catalysts operating with a twofold molar excess of acrylonitrile. On the other hand, ruthe- nium-indenylidene complexes were found to be poor catalysts for this transformation [15]. The cross-metathesis of acrylonitrile with pent-4-en-1-ol to give the C6-nitrile-alcohol, carried out with 5 mol-% of Grubbs-Hoveyda II (4) is concentration dependent and the best yield (74%; Z/E = 2.5 : 1) was obtained in a diluted solution (0.07 M) ( Fig.…”
Section: Cross-metathesis Of Acrylonitrile and Terminal Olefins With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reveal that the most efficient catalytic systems are based on relatively high loading of Grubbs-Hoveyda-Blechert catalysts operating with a twofold molar excess of acrylonitrile. On the other hand, ruthe- nium-indenylidene complexes were found to be poor catalysts for this transformation [15]. The cross-metathesis of acrylonitrile with pent-4-en-1-ol to give the C6-nitrile-alcohol, carried out with 5 mol-% of Grubbs-Hoveyda II (4) is concentration dependent and the best yield (74%; Z/E = 2.5 : 1) was obtained in a diluted solution (0.07 M) ( Fig.…”
Section: Cross-metathesis Of Acrylonitrile and Terminal Olefins With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in sharp contrast with previous results from the literature that demonstrated the superior activity of second generation ruthenium-benzylidene or indenylidene catalysts based on the PCy 3 ligand, such as 2 or 4, over their first generation counterparts (1 and 3, respectively) in several types of CM reactions. [47,54] This discrepancy further suggests that complexes 10 and 11 are particularly stable in solution and are much slower initiators for olefin metathesis than most ruthenium-alkylidene species investigated so far.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Based on an initial screening [137], ring-closing metathesis of 102a was performed with M1 [140] (30 mol%) and gave 101a in 91% yield, while RCM in the presence of Zhan-1B [141] (10 mol%) resulted in the isolation of 101a in 98% yield. Despite the high yields, high catalyst loading and high dilution conditions (<3 mM) were required.…”
Section: Rcm Of Peptide-based Drug Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%