2013
DOI: 10.1021/ic4010196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium(II) and Osmium(II) Complexes Bearing Bipyridine and the N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Based C^N^C Pincer Ligand: An Experimental and Density Functional Theory Study

Abstract: Ruthenium(II) and osmium(II) complexes [M(C^N^C)(N^N)L](n+) (L = Cl(-), n = 1; L = CH3CN, t-BuNC, n = 2) containing a neutral tridentate N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-based pincer ligand, either 2,6-bis(1-butylimidazol-2-ylidene)pyridine (C(1)^N^C(1)) or 2,6-bis(3-butylbenzimidazol-2-ylidene)pyridine (C(2)^N^C(2)), and a neutral 2,2'-bipyridine-type aromatic diimine have been prepared. Investigations into the effects of varying M (Ru and Os), C^N^C, N^N, and L on the structural, electrochemical, absorption, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond distances of Ru–C NHC and Ru–C CN are 2.054(3)–2.063(3) and 2.002(3) Å respectively. These Ru–C NHC distances are similar to those in chloride-ligated complexes [Ru II (C ∧ N ∧ C)(N ∧ N)Cl] + (N ∧ N = 2,2′-bipyridine-like diimine ligands, Ru–C NHC = 2.048(2)–2.062(4) Å)30.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The bond distances of Ru–C NHC and Ru–C CN are 2.054(3)–2.063(3) and 2.002(3) Å respectively. These Ru–C NHC distances are similar to those in chloride-ligated complexes [Ru II (C ∧ N ∧ C)(N ∧ N)Cl] + (N ∧ N = 2,2′-bipyridine-like diimine ligands, Ru–C NHC = 2.048(2)–2.062(4) Å)30.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…With reference to our previous spectroscopic studies on the [Ru II (C ∧ N ∧ C)(bpy)L] n+ system, the lowest-energy absorption band (λ max = 464 nm, ε max = 7.1 × 10 3  dm 3 mol −1 cm −1 ) is assigned as d π (Ru II ) → π*(bpy) MLCT transition30. The assignment is further supported by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculation on model complex 1′ , where its metal core is the same as that in 1 except the butyl chains on the C ∧ N ∧ C are replaced by methyl groups to reduce the computational cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations