2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium-Catalyzed β-Alkylation of Secondary Alcohols and α-Alkylation of Ketones via Borrowing Hydrogen: Dramatic Influence of the Pendant N-Heterocycle

Abstract: Three bidentate ruthenium­(II) complexes with a pyridonate fragment were prepared and fully characterized. These complexes are structurally similar, but differ in their pendant substituents. Complex 1 contains a phenyl unit, whereas complexes 2 and 3 have uncoordinated thienyl and thiazolyl groups, respectively. These complexes were tested as catalysts for β-alkylation of secondary alcohols with primary alcohols, and 3 shows the highest activity, suggesting the thiazolyl ring participates in the catalytic proc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(42 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complexes 4 , 5 , 6 , and 8 do exhibit good activity for the catalysis, whereas [Cp*IrCl 2 ] 2 and [Cp*Ir(bpy)Cl]Cl show poor activity in this alkylation, clearly indicating the necessity of the naphthyridine‐pyridine ligand. To our disappointment, the reactivity of 8 appears to be superior to other naphthyridine‐pyridine complexes 4 , 5 , and 6 , indicating that the extra pendant functionality does not have the directing effect in the reactions …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Complexes 4 , 5 , 6 , and 8 do exhibit good activity for the catalysis, whereas [Cp*IrCl 2 ] 2 and [Cp*Ir(bpy)Cl]Cl show poor activity in this alkylation, clearly indicating the necessity of the naphthyridine‐pyridine ligand. To our disappointment, the reactivity of 8 appears to be superior to other naphthyridine‐pyridine complexes 4 , 5 , and 6 , indicating that the extra pendant functionality does not have the directing effect in the reactions …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3‐(3‐chlorophenyl)‐1‐phenylpropan‐1‐one (3 fa) Yield 208 mg 85 % (Catalyst Ru1 ), 212.9 mg 87 % (Catalyst Ru2 ); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 7.95 (d, J =8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (t, J =7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J =7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (t, J =2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 2H), 3.29 (t, J =7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.04 (t, J =7.6 Hz, 2H). 13 C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 198.79, 143.44, 136.79, 134.31, 133.30, 129.87, 128.75, 128.12, 126.81, 126.47, 40.09, 29.74.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3‐(3‐Bromo‐phenyl)‐1‐phenyl‐propan‐1‐one (3 na) : [31] White solid. Yield: 256.4 mg, 89 %, mp 69–70 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yield: 207.6 mg, 91 %. 1 3-(4-Fluoro-phenyl)-1-phenyl-propan-1-one (3 ka): [31] Colorless oil. Yield: 216.7 mg, 95 %.…”
Section: General Procedures For Catalytic Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%