Russian Political-Economic Thought

Sorokin, D.

doi:10.2753/rss1061-1428430283

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some economists also argue for the development of a purely 15 Interview with I.I., Ekaterinburg, 14 April 2011. 16 'O poryadke osushestvleniya inostranykh investitsii v khozyaistve obshchestva imeyushie strategicheskoe znachenie dlya oborony strany i bezopasnosti gosudarstva', Federal'nyi zakon n857, effective from 7 May 2008, available at: http://fas.gov.ru/legislative-acts/legislative-acts_20103.html, accessed 7 November 2014. national political economy that is able to consider those characteristics and integrate social issues (Abalkin 2002), as well as national interests (Sorokin 2002), within its theoretical framework. In the strategic model, state intervention is a common good, whereas corruption is not a relevant issue: 'Bribes are not the real issue here!…”

Section: Legitimising Patriotism Through National Independencementioning

confidence: 99%

Redefining Business Values in Russia: The Boundaries of Globalisation and Patriotism in Contemporary Russian Industry

Dufy

2015

Europe-Asia Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceIn the aftermath of Russia's accession process to the World Trade Organization in 2011, an extensive public debate emerged on the modernisation of the economy. Enhanced state intervention and authoritarian modernisation were promoted as suitable options for Russia by opponents to neo-liberalism. Medvedev's liberal alternative was promptly discredited in the course of the political competition with Putin. Using ethnographic work, the present essay identifies three models of economic reform and investigates the way they have been considered by professionals in business and trade. The first model, the strategic model, contrary to conventional wisdom, is discussed in the discourse of business actors in terms of economic patriotism, public intervention and state strategic planning; second, the market model is viewed by others as a fully legitimate model; and a third model, the innovation model, combines narratives of efficiency and autonomy, which is attractive but fragile. Beyond their differences, these views have in common a concern to display the relationship of the business sector to the political sphere as a key variable for economic reform

show abstract

Section: Legitimising Patriotism Through National Independencementioning

confidence: 99%

Redefining Business Values in Russia: The Boundaries of Globalisation and Patriotism in Contemporary Russian Industry

Dufy

2015

Europe-Asia Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Russian Political-Economic Thought

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Redefining Business Values in Russia: The Boundaries of Globalisation and Patriotism in Contemporary Russian Industry

Redefining Business Values in Russia: The Boundaries of Globalisation and Patriotism in Contemporary Russian Industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About